The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
OER quality tips
Kawachi, Paul

Type of worktraining handout
PeriodicalPages 1-12
PublisherCEMCA, COL

Paul Kawachi (email: has prepared this training handout as a derivative of the CEMCA Publication entitled “Quality Assurance Guidelines for Open Educational Resources: TIPS Framework” written by him based on data collected through consultation with experts and research.

To help you prepare your materials for safely storing and re-using later on, we have compiled this pamphlet of ideas that you can look through for ways to develop your own materials so that you can be assured of good quality resources when you next need them.

To sort out these ideas collected from other teachers around the world, we have put them
into four sections as layers of quality suggestions - each layer covers certain points that you could consider when designing your materials:

-Teaching and learning processes
-Information and material content
-Presentation product and format
-System technical and technology

Keywords motivation · OER creation · OER framework

Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar

OERTips (1).pdf · 423KB2 downloads

Viewed by 13 distinct readers


The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


Quality Assurance Guidelines for Open Educational Resources: TIPS framework
Kawachi, Paul
Match: Kawachi, Paul; quality; OER framework

Critical evaluation of quality criteria and quality instruments in OER repositories for the encouragement of effective teacher engagement
Connell, Marina; Connell, John
This paper offers a short evaluation of the variety of quality criteria used in Open Educational Resources and some of the methods and practices in use to ensure quality. The paper surveys and reviews effective ...
Match: quality

Quality frameworks for MOOCs
Jansen, Darco; Rosewell, Jon; Kear, Karen; Jemni, Mohamed; et al.
The hype surrounding MOOCs has been tempered by scepticism about the quality of MOOCs. The possible flaws of MOOCs include the quality of the pedagogies employed, low completion rates and a failure to deliver on the ...
Match: quality

Toward a quality model for UNED MOOCs
Read, Timothy; Rodrigo, Covadonga; Ullmo, Pierre-Antoine; Koskinen, Tapio
This article discusses a prototype quality model developed for courses in the first edition of the UNED MOOC initiative (where over 170,000 students undertook 20 MOOCs between October 2012 and May 2013). It is argued ...
Match: quality

Changing the trajectory: Quality for opening up education
Creelman, Alastair; Shamarina-Heidenreich, Tatiana; Stracke, Christian M.; Kear, Karen; et al.
The jointly-organised EFQUEL Innovation Forum (EIF) 2014 and International Learning Innovations and Quality (LINQ) Conference took place in Crete on 7-9 May. The event addressed innovations and quality in lifelong ...
Match: quality

Quality of learning materials, a minimum model for Wikiwijs
Schuwer, Robert
In the Netherlands, Wikiwijs has to be the place where all teachers of the Netherlands, ranging from primary education to higher education, can (co)develop, share, rework and use digital learning materials, published ...
Match: quality

OER quality and adaptation in K-12: Comparing teacher evaluations of copyright-restricted, open, and open/adapted textbooks
Kimmons, Royce; McGreal, Rory; Conrad, Dianne
Conducted in conjunction with an institute on open textbook adaptation, this study compares textbook evaluations from practicing K-12 classroom teachers (n = 30) on three different types of textbooks utilized in their ...
Match: quality

What do we mean by quality when teaching in a digital age?
Bates, Tony
Match: quality

Pedagogical quality enrichment in OER based courseware: Guiding principles
Misra, Pradeep; Gil-Jaurena, Inés
This is a critical phase for Open Educational Resources (OER) movement: on one side the number of OER is increasing rapidly, and on other side debates about quality of OER-based courseware are heating up. These debates ...
Match: quality

“The fun they had” or about the quality of MOOC
Ghislandi, Patrizia
The present paper regards a systematic review of the published literature about the quality of MOOC. It dwells upon some background questions: we have to evaluate MOOC in different ways from e-learning?; what about the ...
Match: quality