The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
Quality frameworks for MOOCs
Jansen, Darco · Rosewell, Jon · Kear, Karen

PublishedAugust 2016
SeriesLecture Notes in Educational Technology
Edition 1, Chapter 14, Pages 261–281
PublisherOpen education: From OERs to MOOCs, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
EditorsJemni, Mohamed · Kinshuk · Khribi, Mohamed Koutheair

ABSTRACT
The hype surrounding MOOCs has been tempered by scepticism about the quality of MOOCs. The possible flaws of MOOCs include the quality of the pedagogies employed, low completion rates and a failure to deliver on the promise of inclusive and equitable quality education for all. On the other hand, MOOCs that have given a boost to open and online education have become a symbol of a larger modernisation agenda for universities, and are perceived as tools for universities to improve the quality of blended and online education—both in degree education and Continuous Professional Development. MOOC provision is also much more open to external scrutiny as part of a stronger globalising higher education market. This has important consequences for quality frameworks and quality processes that go beyond the individual MOOC. In this context, different quality approaches are discussed including possible measures at different levels and the tension between product and process models. Two case studies are described: one at the institutional level (The Open University) and one at a MOOC platform level (FutureLearn) and how they intertwine is discussed. The importance of a national or international quality framework which carries with it a certification or label is illustrated with the OpenupEd Quality label. Both the label itself and its practical use are described in detail. The examples will illustrate that MOOCs require quality assurance processes tailored to e-learning and open education, embedded in institutional frameworks. The increasing unbundling of educational services may require additional quality processes.

Keywords dropout · e-learning quality · open learning · quality label · quality of MOOCs

ISBNHardcover 978-3-662-52923-2
ISSNeBook 978-3-662-52925-6
RefereedYes
Rights© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
DOI10.1007/978-3-662-52925-6_14
URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-3-662-52925-6_14
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar


Viewed by 19 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

Changing the trajectory: Quality for opening up education
Creelman, Alastair; Shamarina-Heidenreich, Tatiana; Stracke, Christian M.; Kear, Karen; et al.
The jointly-organised EFQUEL Innovation Forum (EIF) 2014 and International Learning Innovations and Quality (LINQ) Conference took place in Crete on 7-9 May. The event addressed innovations and quality in lifelong ...
Match: Jansen, Darco; Rosewell, Jon; Kear, Karen

The 2018 OpenupEd trend report on MOOCs
Jansen, Darco; Brown, Mark; Read, Timothy; Barcena, Elena; et al.
MOOCs, and open education in general, are providing new learning opportunities for millions of people. Investments in and the uptake of MOOCs are more and more significant worldwide. The 2018 OpenupEd Trend Report on ...
Match: Jansen, Darco

Comparing institutional MOOC strategies: Status report based on a mapping survey conducted in October - December 2015
Jansen, Darco; Goes-Daniels, Miriam; HOME Project; European Association for Distance Teaching Universities
This report presents the results of a MOOC survey amongst higher education institutions (HEIs) with a strong focus on Europe and Canada. The survey was conducted in the fourth quarter of 2015. The results of this survey ...
Match: Jansen, Darco; open learning

Quality indicators within the use of open educational resources in higher education
E.Ossiannilsson; Creelman, A.; Mendez-Vilas, A.
A paradigm shift is emerging in higher education especially regarding how universities should address personalized and collaborative mobile learning. Experiences from three international benchmarking-projects through ...
Match: quality; open learning

Comparing MOOC adoption strategies in Europe: Results from the HOME project survey
Jansen, Darco; Schuwer, Robert; Teixeira, Antonio; Aydin, Cengiz Hakan; et al.
Much of the literature and the academic discussion about the impact of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) in institutional strategic planning has been centred on the US context. However, data shows that although the US ...
Match: Jansen, Darco

Europe embraces MOOCs - A prospective analysis on the way ahead
Teixeira, Antonio; Jansen, Darco; Ubachs, George; Konings, Lizzie
Overview of papers on enhancement of European Higher Education as presented during the Online, Open and Flexible Higher Education Conference in Rome, October 2016 In this contribution we demonstrate that the uptake of ...
Match: Jansen, Darco

Comparing institutional MOOC strategies 2015 country report - Israel: Status report based on a mapping survey conducted in October - December 2015
Kalman, Yoram M.; Jansen, Darco; Goes-Daniels, Miriam; European Association for Distance Teaching Universities; HOME Project
Executive Summary This report details the responses of seven Israeli higher education institutions (HEIs) to survey questions about their MOOC offerings, and compares them to other European HEIs. The surveys show that ...
Match: Jansen, Darco

Comparing institutional MOOC strategies 2015- Czech Republic report: Status report based on a mapping survey conducted in October – December 2015
Rohlíková, Lucie; Rohlík, Ondřej; Jansen, Darco; Goes-Daniels, Miriam; et al.
Executive Summary Institutional MOOC involvement Czech HEIs are mostly still in the process of finding their way to their own MOOC courses. The Czech Association of Distance Teaching Universities (ČADUV) at the ...
Match: Jansen, Darco

MOOCs in Europe: Overview of papers representing a collective European response on MOOCs as presented during the HOME conference in Rome November 2015
Bang, Joergen; Dalsgaard, Christian; Kjaer, Arne; O’Donovan, Maria; et al.
Table of contents Foreword Part 1: Regional MOOC initiatives Building OOC layers on top of existing courses (M)OOCs in Iceland: Language and learning communities EduOpen network in Italy Part 2: Role media ...
Match: Jansen, Darco

Position papers for European cooperation on MOOCs
Cooperman, Larry; Dillenbourg, Pierre; van Valkenburg, Willem; Kos, Timo; et al.
An overview of position papers on the opportunities and characteristics for European cooperation as presented during the HOME conference in Porto November 2014 Based on an open call for position papers19 experts ...
Match: Jansen, Darco