The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
A comparison of production processes for OER
Schuwer, Robert · Lane, Andy · Counotte-Potman, Anda · Wilson, Martina

Published2011
JournalTime, Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey
Volume 22, Pages 351 – 359

ABSTRACT
In most cases the initial production and publication of OER is undertaken by a University and funded through a special project with grants from external bodies. In this phase, OER are developed both from scratch or derived from existing Higher Education courses. After this project phase, the ongoing development and publication of OER continues and the question of the management and upgrading of the OER comes into focus. The costs of producing and upgrading OER are an important factor in devising a sustainable process. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an efficient process for the continuing production, publication and maintenance of OER. To learn more about influencing factors of production process efficiency we have compared the production processes of two institutions, the Open University UK (OU-UK) and the Open Universiteit Netherlands (OU-NL), both in the initial project phase (OpenLearn for OU-UK and OpenER for OU-NL) and the post initial phase. We aim to identify the differences and commonalities and the influence of these on the efficiency of the production processes. The main difference between the two Universities is the adoption of state-of-the-art (XML) standard to deliver to different channels at OU-UK. At OU-NL this adoption has just started. Valuable lessons learned in the project phase for the post initial phase are clear specification of requirements for selection of an open course and utilization of technologies already being used for regular materials production. Both institutions firstly drew upon the existing expertise and capabilities for educational resource production being used for regular courses. But rather than strictly follow exactly the same process and possibly compromise the more mission critical development of resources for students both institutions chose to experiment or adapt this process to help provide lessons that might be taken back into regular materials production. Once these lessons and experiences had been gained both open universities sought to reduce the costs of dealing with legacy or de novo educational resources by integrating identification, production and publication within the regular curriculum and course development processes.


Languageen
Rightsby/3.0
URLhttp://conference.ocwconsortium.org/index.php/2011/cambridge/paper/view/126
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar



AVAILABLE FILES
307800D6.pdf · 315.5KB34 downloads



Viewed by 19 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

The 2015 open and online education trend report: Perspectives on developments in Dutch higher education
Baas, Marjon; Buitendijk, Simone; van Elk, Lianne; Filius, Renée; et al.
For the fourth consecutive year, the Open Education Special Interest Group and SURFnet have prepared a trend report outlining the latest dynamic developments in the area of open content, open education and – as of ...
Match: Schuwer, Robert

Beyond the pioneering phase: Moving towards the adoption of open education
Schuwer, Robert; Wild, Ulrike; Baas, Marjon; van Hees, Janina; et al.
MIT launched the global Open Educational Resources (OER) movement in 2001. The movement gained a major impetus in 2012 following the emergence of MOOCs: free online courses, often offered by leading research ...
Match: Schuwer, Robert

Connecting various forms of openness: Seeking a stronger value proposition
van der Woert, Nicolai; Schuwer, Robert; Ouwehand, Martijn; Baas, Marjon; et al.
In addition to open education, open access, open source software and open innovation, the open movement has also developed other varieties of ‘openness’. Although many types of ‘openness’ exist, they are all ...
Match: Schuwer, Robert

Research agenda
Schuwer, Robert; Baas, Marjon; van Hees, Janina; Jacobi, Ria; et al.
To gain an overview of subjects that are currently on the research agenda, an analysis has been conducted on papers, presentations and abstracts presented at a variety of major conferences on open and online education. ...
Match: Schuwer, Robert

Production of OER, a quest for efficiency
Schuwer, Robert; Wilson, Tina; van Valkenburg, Willem; Lane, Andy
In most initiatives to publish Open Educational Resources (OER), the production of OER is the activity with the highest costs. Based on literature and personal experiences a list of relevant characteristics of ...
Match: Schuwer, Robert; Lane, Andy

Open Educational Resources: Innovation, research and practice
Burgos Aguilar, José Vladimir; Cox, Glenda; Czerniewicz, Laura; D'Antoni, Susan; et al.
Open Educational Resources (OER) – that is, teaching, learning and research materials that their owners make free to others to use, revise and share – offer a powerful means of expanding the reach and effectiveness ...
Match: Schuwer, Robert; Lane, Andy

Practical aids: Conceptual framework for online education and infographic
Jelgerhuis, Hester; Baas, Marjon; van Hees, Janina; Jacobi, Ria; et al.
So what do we actually mean by the term open and online education? This question prompted SURFnet to organise a ‘definition session’ in collaboration with ten experts from the field. The participants concluded that ...
Match: Schuwer, Robert

Quality of learning materials, a minimum model for Wikiwijs
Schuwer, Robert
In the Netherlands, Wikiwijs has to be the place where all teachers of the Netherlands, ranging from primary education to higher education, can (co)develop, share, rework and use digital learning materials, published ...
Match: Schuwer, Robert

Mass customization of education by an institution of HE: What can we learn from industry?
Schuwer, Robert; Kusters, Rob; McGreal, Rory; Conrad, Dianne
One of the claims the OER movement makes is that availability of (open) digital learning materials improves the quality of education. The promise is the ability to offer educational programs that take into account ...
Match: Schuwer, Robert

Impact of Open Educational Resources in The Netherlands
Schuwer, Robert; Kirschner, Paul A.; Hendriks, Maaike; van der Baaren, John; et al.
This paper draws on research into repository use and use/reuse of learning objects to identify gaps in what we currently know about choosing and reusing online content within new contexts. It suggests that the criteria ...
Match: Schuwer, Robert