The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
State of the art review of quality issues related to Open Educational Resources (OER)
Camilleri, Anthony F. · Ehlers, Ulf Daniel · Pawlowski, Jan · European Commission. Joint Research Centre. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies [corporate]

PublishedMay 2014
PeriodicalVolume 52 S. - JRC Scientific and Policy Reports
PublisherPublications Office of the European Union 2014
CountryLuxembourg, Europe

This report provides an overview of definitions of quality for OER, suggests a conceptual mapping and reviews the major issues related to the quality for OER. The outcomes of the report can be outlined as follows: First, when reviewing a set of definitions of OER we find that they all: cover both use and reuse, repurposing, and modification of resources; include free use of these resources for educational purposes by teachers and learners; encompass all types of digital media. Secondly, there are a variety of quality approaches, tools and procedures which may be applied to OER. Due to the above-mentioned freedom, however, the traditional lifecycle of a resource, particularly with respect to the processes of creation, editing, evaluation and use, is significantly disrupted. Whereas before these steps were traditionally distinct, consecutive and managed by various actors, the freedom granted by OER leads to a blurring of these boundaries. The involvement of many more actors in each step therefore means a federation of responsibility for each step, which in turn can lead to cross-over in the functions and timing of processes, as well as sub-cycles (such as several rounds of editing and evaluation). Thirdly, opening up of learning architectures is in turn leading to the unbundling of processes of course design, teaching, learning, assessment and recognition within formal education and the emergence of innovative delivery models such as MOOCs. Within formal education, the quality of assessment and the recognition of awards based on these assessments is critical to recognising the quality of the teaching given and the learning achieved. We highlight, however, that recognition and assessment tools have not yet fully evolved to take into account the new phenomenon which has the potential to bypass existing trust networks that have been built up with formal education. (DIPF/author)

Keywords lifecycle of resources · OER definition · OER instructional materials · OER quality

RefereedDoes not apply
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar

European_Commission_2014_OER.pdf · 2.2MB89 downloads

Viewed by 71 distinct readers


The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


Open learning recognition: Taking Open Educational Resources a step further
Camilleri, Anthony F.; Ferrari, Luca; Haywood, Jeff; Maina, Marcelo; et al.
Match: Camilleri, Anthony F.

Beyond OER: Shifting focus to open educational practices
Andrade, António; Ehlers, Ulf Daniel; Caine, Abel; Carneiro, Roberto; et al.
Open Educational Resources are teaching, learning or research materials that are in the public domain or released with an intellectual property license that allows for free use, adaptation, and distribution. In ...
Match: Ehlers, Ulf Daniel; OER definition

Open educational resources and teaching in the 21st century: Questions concerning authority
Ferreira, Giselle
As a source of materials for education the Web is, to a large extent, shifting ground. Open Educational Resources (OER) provided by Higher Education Institutions constitute, at least in principle, a reliable category of ...
Match: resources; OER quality

Blockchain in education
Alexander Grech; Camilleri, Anthony F.; dos Santos, Andreia Inamorato
This report introduces the fundamental principles of the Blockchain focusing on its potential for the education sector. It explains how this technology may both disrupt institutional norms and empower learners. It ...
Match: Camilleri, Anthony F.

Barriers and motivators for using OER in schools
Ehlers, Ulf-Daniel; Richter, Thomas; Ehlers, Ulf Daniel; Koskinen, Tapio
For this study we investigated German teachers to see how they use, reuse, produce and manage OER. The research explored what motivators and barriers effect their use of OER, what others can learn from their Open ...
Match: Ehlers, Ulf Daniel

The organisational impact of open educational resources
Sclater, Niall; Ehlers, Ulf Daniel; Schneckenberg, Dirk
The open educational resource (OER) movement has been growing rapidly since 2001, stimulated by funding from benefactors such as the Hewlett Foundation and UNESCO, and providing educational content freely to ...
Match: Ehlers, Ulf Daniel

Open educational resources repositories literature review – Towards a comprehensive quality approaches framework
Clements, Kati; Pawlowski, Jan; Manouselis, Nikos
Today, Open Educational Resources (OER) are commonly stored, used, adapted, remixed and shared within Learning object repositories (LORs) which have recently started expanding their design to support collaborative ...
Match: Pawlowski, Jan

Collaborating on ideas: Tackling barriers to Open Education
Pirkkalainen, Henri; Pawlowski, Jan
This paper presents key issues around collaborative idea development in the context of open education. Current initiatives and solutions around OER have been successful in promoting the concept of openness that is now ...
Match: Pawlowski, Jan

Why Open Educational Resources repositories fail - Review of quality assurance approaches
Manouselis, Niko; Pawlowski, Jan; Clements, Kati
Regardless of the amount of open educational resources (OER) available, many learning object repositories LORs fail to attract active users and sustainable funding solutions. Previous studies indicate that quality of ...
Match: Pawlowski, Jan

Open educational resources and social software in global e-learning settings
Pawlowski, Jan; Pirkkalainen, Henri; Yli-Luoma, P.
In the following, we show different initiatives and access points as well as different opportunities – however, we also identify barriers and possible guidelines to overcome those. One possible support mechanism for ...
Match: Pawlowski, Jan