The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
Open educational resources repositories literature review – Towards a comprehensive quality approaches framework
Clements, Kati · Pawlowski, Jan · Manouselis, Nikos

Published2015
JournalComputers in Human Behavior
Volume 51, Pages 1098-1106

ABSTRACT
Today, Open Educational Resources (OER) are commonly stored, used, adapted, remixed and shared within Learning object repositories (LORs) which have recently started expanding their design to support collaborative teaching and learning. As numbers of OER available freely keep on growing, many LORs struggle to find sustainable business models and get the users’ attention. Previous studies have shown that Quality assurance of the LORs is a significant factor when predicting the success of the repository. Within the study, we analysed technology enhanced learning literature systematically regarding LORs’ quality approaches and specific collaborative instruments. This paper’s theoretical contribution is a comprehensive framework of LOR quality approaches (LORQAF) that demonstrates the wide spectrum of possible approaches taken and classifies them. The purpose of this study is to assist LOR developers in designing sustainable quality assurance approaches utilizing full the potential of collaborative quality assurance tools.

Keywords collaborative learning environments · computer supported collaborative learning · learning object repositories · literature review · Open Educational Resources · quality assurance

ISSN0747-5632
RightsCopyright 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
DOI10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.026
URLhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563215002162
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar


Viewed by 2 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

Why Open Educational Resources repositories fail - Review of quality assurance approaches
Manouselis, Niko; Pawlowski, Jan; Clements, Kati
Regardless of the amount of open educational resources (OER) available, many learning object repositories LORs fail to attract active users and sustainable funding solutions. Previous studies indicate that quality of ...
Match: Clements, Kati; Pawlowski, Jan; learning object repositories; Open Educational Resources

State of the art review of quality issues related to Open Educational Resources (OER)
Camilleri, Anthony F.; Ehlers, Ulf Daniel; Pawlowski, Jan; European Commission. Joint Research Centre. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies
This report provides an overview of definitions of quality for OER, suggests a conceptual mapping and reviews the major issues related to the quality for OER. The outcomes of the report can be outlined as follows: ...
Match: Pawlowski, Jan

Collaborating on ideas: Tackling barriers to Open Education
Pirkkalainen, Henri; Pawlowski, Jan
This paper presents key issues around collaborative idea development in the context of open education. Current initiatives and solutions around OER have been successful in promoting the concept of openness that is now ...
Match: Pawlowski, Jan

Open educational resources and social software in global e-learning settings
Pawlowski, Jan; Pirkkalainen, Henri; Yli-Luoma, P.
In the following, we show different initiatives and access points as well as different opportunities – however, we also identify barriers and possible guidelines to overcome those. One possible support mechanism for ...
Match: Pawlowski, Jan

Agricultural learning repositories (AgLR 2008) e-conference
Manouselis, Nikos; Salokhe, Gauri
This report provides the summary of the discussions that took place during the Agricultural Learning Repositories (AgLR 2008, http://aglr.aua.gr/econf.php) E-Conference. AgLR 2008 aimed to explore the needs and ...
Match: Manouselis, Nikos

User-oriented quality for OER: understanding teachers' views on re-use, quality, and trust
Clements, K I.; Pawlowski, J M.
We analysed how teachers as users of open educational resources (OER) repositories act in the re-use process and how they perceive quality. Based on a quantitative empirical study, we also surveyed which quality ...
Match: learning object repositories; Open Educational Resources

Are MOOCs Open Educational Resources? A literature review on history, definitions and typologies of OER and MOOCs
Stracke, Christian M.; Downes, Stephen; Conole, Grainne; Burgos, Daniel; Nascimbeni, Fabio
Open Education gained more visibility as a result of the emergence of Open Educational Resources (OER) and Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). This article discusses whether MOOCs should be considered as OER. Open ...
Match: literature review

The HumBox: Changing educational practice around a learning resource repository
Millard, David E.; Borthwick, Kate; Howard, Yvonne; McSweeney, Patrick; Hargood, Charlie
The HumBox is a learning resource repository for the Humanities educational community in the UK. Over the last three years the challenge for HumBox has been to act as not only a shared library for its community, but ...
Match: learning object repositories; Open Educational Resources

Use of Open Educational Resources: Challenges and strategies
Chen, Qing; Tsang, P.; Cheung, SKS; Lee, VSK; Huang, RH
Since MIT announced its OpenCourseWare Program in 2001, Open educational resources has gradually developed into a practical hotspot and got rapidly development in the higher education field of the world. In a sense, the ...
Match: literature review; Open Educational Resources

Reflections on sustaining Open Educational Resources: an institutional case study
Lane, Andy
This paper reviews some of the literature on the sustainability of Open Educational Resources (OER) and what it has to say about successful or sustainable open content projects on the internet.
Match: literature review; Open Educational Resources