The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
MOOCs in higher education magazines: A content analysis of internal stakeholder perspectives
Urrutia, Manuel León · White, Steve · White, Su · Zvacek, Susan [secondary] · Restivo, Maria Teresa [secondary] · Uhomoibhi, James [secondary] · Helfert, Markus [secondary]

PublishedFebruary 2016
SeriesCommunications in Computer and Information Science
Volume 583, Pages 395–405
PublisherComputer Supported Education: 7th International Conference, CSEDU 2015, Lisbon, Portugal, May 23-25, 2015, Revised Selected Papers, Springer International Publishing
EditorsUhomoibhi, James · Helfert, Markus · Zvacek, Susan · Restivo, Maria Teresa

ABSTRACT
Higher Education magazines have echoed the rapid spread of MOOCs in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) since 2012. In their pages, MOOC related articles are proliferating. The focus of such articles has often been the disruptive nature as well as the survival of this new form of open online education, especially the first years. However, there is also a great deal of mentions of how internal stakeholders in HEIs perceive the advent of MOOCs. These perceptions are the object of analysis in this article. Using the Content Analysis (CA) method, MOOC related sources in three Higher Education magazines during 2014 have been analysed against a set of key themes. These themes have been established by combining data from two previous studies: a Content Analysis of MOOC related academic literature, and a set of interviews to internal stakeholders using grounded theory. As the findings indicate, in 2014 the main concerns of internal stakeholders have been the new teaching practices and new work dynamics resulting from the incorporation of MOOCs in their working routines. It is argued that educational media no longer focuses on the debate of the future of MOOCs. Rather, the debate is on how MOOCs should be best implemented from a practitioner’s perspective.

Keywords content analysis · HE magazines · MOOCs · university stakeholders

Published atCham
ISBN978-3-319-29585-5
RefereedYes
RightsSpringer International Publishing Switzerland
DOI10.1007/978-3-319-29585-5_23
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar


Viewed by 115 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

Challenges of identifying second language English speakers in MOOCs
Duru, Ismail; Sunar, Ayse Saliha; Dogan, Gulustan; White, Su; et al.
In this study, we aim to analyse English as a Second Language (ESL) and English as a First Language (EFL) MOOC participants' engagements in a MOOC. We aim to find out key points which directly effect learners' dropout ...
Match: white, su

Professional development through MOOCs in higher education institutions: Challenges and opportunities for PhD students working as mentors
Urrutia, Manuel León; Fielding, Sarah; White, Su
The advent of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) has been altering the Higher Education landscape in recent years. This kind of courses are penetrating in an increasing number of universities, the majority of which do ...
Match: urrutia, manuel len; white, su; moocs

Does gamification in MOOC discussion forums work?
Reischer, Matthias; Khalil, Mohammad; Ebner, Martin; Kloos, Carlos Delgado; et al.
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are a new form of learning environment aimed towards accessibility and openness using contemporary technologies. One of the MOOC's key features is the social interaction which usually ...
Match: white, su; moocs

Who wants to chat on a MOOC? Lessons from a peer recommender system
Bouchet, François; Labarthe, Hugues; Bachelet, Rémi; Yacef, Kalina; et al.
Peer recommender systems (PRS) in MOOCs have been shown to help reducing attrition and increase performance of those who use them. But who are the students using them and what are their motivations? And why are some ...
Match: white, su

Effect of free certificate discontinuation in completion rates of MOOC
Despujol, Ignacio M.; Turró, Carlos; Castañeda, Linda; Busquets, Jaime; et al.
Completion rates have been a controversial topic since Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) became mainstream in 2012. In January 2016, based in previous trials, edx.org discontinued the free honor code certificate for ...
Match: white, su

Understanding learning and teaching in MOOCs from the perspectives of students and instructors: A review of literature from 2014 to 2016
Deng, Ruiqi; Benckendorff, Pierre; Gannaway, Deanne; Kloos, Carlos Delgado; et al.
This article presents the results of a literature review on key learning and teaching dimensions in MOOCs. 95 studies published from January 2014 to October 2016 were selected for review. Four important learning and ...
Match: white, su

Early prediction and variable importance of certificate accomplishment in a MOOC
Ruipérez-Valiente, José A.; Cobos, Ruth; Muñoz-Merino, Pedro J.; Andujar, Álvaro; et al.
The emergence of MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) makes available big amounts of data about students' interaction with online educational platforms. This allows for the possibility of making predictions about future ...
Match: white, su; moocs

The drivers of employer support for professional skill development in MOOCs
Hamori, Monika; Kloos, Carlos Delgado; Jermann, Patrick; Pérez-Sanagustín, Mar; et al.
This paper looks at the job-, employee- and organization-specific drivers of support from employers for MOOCs. A survey of 1481 employed learners is used to test the hypotheses. Results show that employers are more ...
Match: white, su

Towards full engagement for open online education. A practical experience for a MicroMaster
Hernández, Rocael; Amado-Salvatierra, Hector R.; Kloos, Carlos Delgado; Jermann, Patrick; et al.
This work explores on the different phases of the student's participation in a MOOC. For this particular study three phases of a MOOC are defined: pre-MOOC, MOOC and post-MOOC. This work presents an innovative framework ...
Match: white, su

To change or not to change? That's the question... On MOOC-success, barriers and their implications
Henderikx, Maartje; Kreijns, Karel; Kalz, Marco; Kloos, Carlos Delgado; et al.
This explorative study aimed to get an understanding of MOOC-success as seen from the perspective of the MOOC-taker and the types of barriers which might stand in the way of this success. Data of two MOOCs was used to ...
Match: white, su; moocs