MIT OpenCourseWare 2009 Program Evaluation Findings Summary
| Published | November 2009 |
| Publisher | MIT |
| Language | eng |
| URL | http://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/global/09_Eval_Summary.pdf |
| Export options | BibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar |
AVAILABLE FILES
Viewed by 398 distinct readers
CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS
The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.
Click a star to be the first to rate this document
▶ POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS
OOPS, Turning MIT Opencourseware into Chinese: An analysis of a community of practice of global translators
Lee, Mimi Miyoung; Lin, Meng Fen Grace; Bonk, Curtis J.
An all-volunteer organization called the Opensource Opencourseware Prototype System (OOPS), headquartered in Taiwan, was initially designed to translate open source materials from MIT OpenCourseWare (OCW) site into ...
Match: opencourseware
Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies
Means, Barb; Toyama, Yukie; Murphy, Robert; Bakia, Marianne; U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development
A systematic search of the research literature from 1996 through July 2008 identified more than a thousand empirical studies of online learning. Analysts screened these studies to find those that (a) contrasted an ...
Match: evaluation
OERu context evaluation
Murphy, Angela
A survey was developed and launched in May and June 2012 to assess the extent to which OERu members are ready for participating in the pilot of the OERu model and determine which challenges organisations are currently ...
Match: evaluation
A sustainable model for OpenCourseWare development
Johansen, Justin; Wiley, David A.
The purposes of this study were to (a) determine the cost of converting BYU Independent Study's e-learning courses into OpenCourseWare, (b) assess the impact of opening those courses on paid enrollment in the ...
Match: opencourseware
Meaningful learner information for MOOC instructors examined through a contextualized evaluation framework
Douglas, Kerrie; Zielinski, Mitchell; Merzdorf, Hillary; Diefes-Dux, Heidi; Bermel, Peter
Improving STEM MOOC evaluation requires an understanding of the current state of STEM MOOC evaluation, as perceived by all stakeholders. To this end, we investigated what kinds of information STEM MOOC instructors ...
Match: evaluation
Implications of the Delphi method in the evaluation of sustainability open education resource repositories
Wang, Xiaochen; Chen, Tingting; Zhang, Yihan; Yang, Harrison Hao
To better understand the sustainable development of open educational resources (OER), this paper aimed to break through the original ‘fixed’, highly structured evaluation system and develop an open and flexible ...
Match: evaluation
MOOC quality evaluation system: Tomsk State University experience
Dyomin, Victor; Mozhaeva, Galina; Babanskaya, Olesya; Zakharova, Ulyana; et al.
E-learning development comes with an increased attention to its quality that is managed via the control over not only the learners' knowledge but over the learning process, its organization and applied tools. This paper ...
Match: evaluation
The unwalled garden: Growth of the OpenCourseWare consortium, 2001–2008
Carson, Stephen
This article traces the development of the OpenCourseWare movement, including the origin of the concept at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), the implementation of the MIT OpenCourseWare project, and the ...
Match: opencourseware
Peer reviewed courses in OpenCourseWare at Universidad Carlos III de Madrid: towards a P2P assessment system for OERs
Méndez Rodríguez, Eva María; Webster, Susan
Peer review is common practice with scholarly papers and articles prior to publication, but this is not quite the case with educational content, particularly with Open Educational Resources (OERs). The Quality Group for ...
Match: opencourseware
OERRH evaluation framework
Perryman, L -A.
The OERRH Evaluation Framework provides guidelines that allow project processes, outputs and outcomes to be evaluated in ways appropriate to the individual concerns of the various work packages, while at the same time ...
Match: evaluation
