MIT OpenCourseWare 2009 Program Evaluation Findings Summary
| Published | November 2009 |
| Publisher | MIT |
| Language | eng |
| URL | http://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/global/09_Eval_Summary.pdf |
| Export options | BibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar |
AVAILABLE FILES
Viewed by 366 distinct readers
CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS
The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.
Click a star to be the first to rate this document
▶ POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS
OOPS, Turning MIT Opencourseware into Chinese: An analysis of a community of practice of global translators
Lee, Mimi Miyoung; Lin, Meng Fen Grace; Bonk, Curtis J.
An all-volunteer organization called the Opensource Opencourseware Prototype System (OOPS), headquartered in Taiwan, was initially designed to translate open source materials from MIT OpenCourseWare (OCW) site into ...
Match: opencourseware
Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies
Means, Barb; Toyama, Yukie; Murphy, Robert; Bakia, Marianne; U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development
A systematic search of the research literature from 1996 through July 2008 identified more than a thousand empirical studies of online learning. Analysts screened these studies to find those that (a) contrasted an ...
Match: evaluation
OERu context evaluation
Murphy, Angela
A survey was developed and launched in May and June 2012 to assess the extent to which OERu members are ready for participating in the pilot of the OERu model and determine which challenges organisations are currently ...
Match: evaluation
OERRH evaluation framework
Perryman, L -A.
The OERRH Evaluation Framework provides guidelines that allow project processes, outputs and outcomes to be evaluated in ways appropriate to the individual concerns of the various work packages, while at the same time ...
Match: evaluation
Meaningful learner information for MOOC instructors examined through a contextualized evaluation framework
Douglas, Kerrie; Zielinski, Mitchell; Merzdorf, Hillary; Diefes-Dux, Heidi; Bermel, Peter
Improving STEM MOOC evaluation requires an understanding of the current state of STEM MOOC evaluation, as perceived by all stakeholders. To this end, we investigated what kinds of information STEM MOOC instructors ...
Match: evaluation
OpenCourseWare and the self-learner
Lowman, Amy
OpenCourseWare is identified as a learning tool for self-learners around the world. Although thousands of courses are freely available, only a small percentage (by world population standards) are aware of these banks of ...
Match: opencourseware
MOOC quality evaluation system: Tomsk State University experience
Dyomin, Victor; Mozhaeva, Galina; Babanskaya, Olesya; Zakharova, Ulyana; et al.
E-learning development comes with an increased attention to its quality that is managed via the control over not only the learners' knowledge but over the learning process, its organization and applied tools. This paper ...
Match: evaluation
Can massive open online courses fill African evaluation capacity gaps?
Mapitsa, Caitlin B.; Khumalo, Linda; Engel, Hermine; Wooldridge, Dominique
Background: Theory of Change for Development is a free online course developed at an African institution to strengthen evaluation capacity in the region. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) provide a platform for ...
Match: evaluation
Institutional collaborations of OpenCourseware in the cloud era -- Experience of TOCWC
Wan, Hsu-Tien; Lee, Wei-I
Taiwan OpenCourseWare Consortium (TOCWC) was established in 2008. By the end of 2011, there are more than 27 members. All of them are higher-education institutes. Also, we have more than 400 courses, and 75% of them ...
Match: opencourseware
Formative evaluation of Hong Kong's first open textbooks
Yuen, Kin Sun; Li, Kam Cheong; Wong, Billy Tak Ming; Li, Kam Cheong; Yuen, Kin Sun
Twelve open textbooks for the local school curriculum – the first set ever developed in Hong Kong – were completed in 2015. During the development process, formative feedback was gathered from primary and secondary ...
Match: evaluation
