MIT OpenCourseWare 2009 Program Evaluation Findings Summary
| Published | November 2009 |
| Publisher | MIT |
| Language | eng |
| URL | http://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/global/09_Eval_Summary.pdf |
| Export options | BibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar |
AVAILABLE FILES
Viewed by 313 distinct readers
CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS
The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.
Click a star to be the first to rate this document
▶ POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS
Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies
Means, Barb; Toyama, Yukie; Murphy, Robert; Bakia, Marianne; U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development
A systematic search of the research literature from 1996 through July 2008 identified more than a thousand empirical studies of online learning. Analysts screened these studies to find those that (a) contrasted an ...
Match: evaluation
OOPS, Turning MIT Opencourseware into Chinese: An analysis of a community of practice of global translators
Lee, Mimi Miyoung; Lin, Meng Fen Grace; Bonk, Curtis J.
An all-volunteer organization called the Opensource Opencourseware Prototype System (OOPS), headquartered in Taiwan, was initially designed to translate open source materials from MIT OpenCourseWare (OCW) site into ...
Match: opencourseware
OERu context evaluation
Murphy, Angela
A survey was developed and launched in May and June 2012 to assess the extent to which OERu members are ready for participating in the pilot of the OERu model and determine which challenges organisations are currently ...
Match: evaluation
Evaluation of learning objects
Madhura, Kesarkar; Jayashree, Shinde; Sarika, Deshmukh
Open educational resources are digital materials that can be re-used for teaching, learning, research and more, made available free through open licenses, which allow uses of the materials that would not be easily ...
Match: evaluation
MOOC quality evaluation system: Tomsk State University experience
Dyomin, Victor; Mozhaeva, Galina; Babanskaya, Olesya; Zakharova, Ulyana; et al.
E-learning development comes with an increased attention to its quality that is managed via the control over not only the learners' knowledge but over the learning process, its organization and applied tools. This paper ...
Match: evaluation
Quality assurance in the open: An evaluation of OER repositories
Atenas, Javiera; Havemann, Leo
The World OER Declaration 2012 recommends that States join efforts to facilitate finding, retrieving and sharing OER. The OER movement has thus far spurred the creation of numerous repository initiatives worldwide with ...
Match: evaluation
Evaluation criteria for interactive e-books for open and distance learning
Bozkurt, Aras; Bozkaya, Mujgan; McGreal, Rory; Conrad, Dianne
The aim of this mixed method study is to identify evaluation criteria for interactive e-books. To find answers for the research questions of the study, both quantitative and qualitative data were collected through a ...
Match: evaluation
Can massive open online courses fill African evaluation capacity gaps?
Mapitsa, Caitlin B.; Khumalo, Linda; Engel, Hermine; Wooldridge, Dominique
Background: Theory of Change for Development is a free online course developed at an African institution to strengthen evaluation capacity in the region. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) provide a platform for ...
Match: evaluation
OER recommender: linking nsdl pathways and opencourseware repositories
Duffin, Joel; Muramatsu, Brandon; Larsen, Ronald; Paepcke, Andreas; et al.
The OER Recommender (www.oerrecommender.org) is a web service that helps people find relevant open educational resources. It links the digital learning resources in the National Science Digital Library (NSDL) ...
Match: opencourseware
Meaningful learner information for MOOC instructors examined through a contextualized evaluation framework
Douglas, Kerrie; Zielinski, Mitchell; Merzdorf, Hillary; Diefes-Dux, Heidi; Bermel, Peter
Improving STEM MOOC evaluation requires an understanding of the current state of STEM MOOC evaluation, as perceived by all stakeholders. To this end, we investigated what kinds of information STEM MOOC instructors ...
Match: evaluation
