The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
MIT OpenCourseWare 2009 Program Evaluation Findings Summary
MIT

PublishedNovember 2009
PublisherMIT
Languageeng
URLhttp://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/global/09_Eval_Summary.pdf
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar



AVAILABLE FILES
09_Eval_Summary[1].pdf · 107.3KB48 downloads



Viewed by 327 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies
Means, Barb; Toyama, Yukie; Murphy, Robert; Bakia, Marianne; U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development
A systematic search of the research literature from 1996 through July 2008 identified more than a thousand empirical studies of online learning. Analysts screened these studies to find those that (a) contrasted an ...
Match: evaluation

OOPS, Turning MIT Opencourseware into Chinese: An analysis of a community of practice of global translators
Lee, Mimi Miyoung; Lin, Meng Fen Grace; Bonk, Curtis J.
An all-volunteer organization called the Opensource Opencourseware Prototype System (OOPS), headquartered in Taiwan, was initially designed to translate open source materials from MIT OpenCourseWare (OCW) site into ...
Match: opencourseware

OERu context evaluation
Murphy, Angela
A survey was developed and launched in May and June 2012 to assess the extent to which OERu members are ready for participating in the pilot of the OERu model and determine which challenges organisations are currently ...
Match: evaluation

Evaluation models of MOOCs in China
Zheng, Qinhua; Chen, Li; Burgos, Daniel
Learning evaluation can not only be used to measure the learner's learning achievement, but also can help teachers to understand the learning situation of the whole course. It is an indispensable part of MOOC learning. ...
Match: evaluation

Evaluation criteria for interactive e-books for open and distance learning
Bozkurt, Aras; Bozkaya, Mujgan; McGreal, Rory; Conrad, Dianne
The aim of this mixed method study is to identify evaluation criteria for interactive e-books. To find answers for the research questions of the study, both quantitative and qualitative data were collected through a ...
Match: evaluation

Massive open online courses: A review of usage and evaluation
Sinclair, Jane; Boyatt, Russell; Rocks, Claire; Joy, Mike
The massive open online course (MOOC) has seen a dramatic rise in prominence over the last five years and is heralded by some as disrupting existing pedagogy and practices within the education sector, while others are ...
Match: evaluation

OER recommender: linking nsdl pathways and opencourseware repositories
Duffin, Joel; Muramatsu, Brandon; Larsen, Ronald; Paepcke, Andreas; et al.
The OER Recommender (www.oerrecommender.org) is a web service that helps people find relevant open educational resources. It links the digital learning resources in the National Science Digital Library (NSDL) ...
Match: opencourseware

2010-2011 African health OER network phase 2 evaluation: Consolidation and sustainability
Harley, Ken
As part of the Hewlett Foundation grant for the African Health OER Network, Professor Ken Harley (University of KwaZulu-Natal) conducts an annual external evaluation of the project. For his 2009 evaluation, Prof Harley ...
Match: evaluation

Teacher Perspective on MOOC Evaluation and Competency-Based Open Learning
Chang, Wen-Li; Sun, Jerry Chih-Yuan
Quality MOOCs (massive open online courses) ensure open learning under the top-down guidance of established criteria and standards. With an evaluative approach, course providers can use the guiding frameworks in ...
Match: evaluation

Meaningful learner information for MOOC instructors examined through a contextualized evaluation framework
Douglas, Kerrie; Zielinski, Mitchell; Merzdorf, Hillary; Diefes-Dux, Heidi; Bermel, Peter
Improving STEM MOOC evaluation requires an understanding of the current state of STEM MOOC evaluation, as perceived by all stakeholders. To this end, we investigated what kinds of information STEM MOOC instructors ...
Match: evaluation