Open, online, and blended: Transactional interactions with MOOC content by learners in three different course formats
Published | June 2017 |
Journal | Online Learning Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 1-25 |
ABSTRACT
During the 2013-14 academic year, Harvard University piloted the use of MOOCs as tools for blended learning in select undergraduate and graduate residential and online courses. One of these courses, The Ancient Greek Hero, combined for—credit (Harvard College and Harvard Extension School) and open online (HarvardX) groups into a single online unit, marking the first time the same instance of a MOOC was used simultaneously by both tuition—paying, credit—seeking students and non—paying, non—credit students enrolled exclusively online. In this article, we analyze and compare the online behavior of students and participants in the three groups that simultaneously participated in The Ancient Greek Hero via the edX platform. We find that, in similar fashion to a traditional learning setting, students enrolled in all three versions of the course engaged the online content in a transactional way, spending their time and effort on activities and exercises in ways that would optimize their desired outcomes. While user behavior was diverse, HarvardX participant engagement tended to be either very deep or virtually nonexistent, while College and Extension School students displayed relatively homogenous patterns of participation, viewing most of the content but interacting mostly with that which affected their overall course grades. Ultimately, we conclude that educators who intend to utilize MOOC content in an effort to apply blended learning techniques to their classrooms should carefully consider how best to incorporate each online element into their overall pedagogical strategy, including how to incentivize interaction with those elements. Further, for MOOCs to have maximum impact, they must address multiple learner motivations and provide participants with multiple modes of interaction with the content and with their peers.Keywords | academic technology · blended learning · distance learning · humanities · MOOC |
ISSN | 2472-5730 |
Other number | 2 |
Refereed | Yes |
Rights | Open Access Policy This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. |
DOI | 10.24059/olj.v21i2.845 |
URL | https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/845 |
Export options | BibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar |
AVAILABLE FILES
Viewed by 100 distinct readers
CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS
The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.










Click a star to be the first to rate this document
▶ POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS
Interactions in MOOCs: The hidden part of the iceberg
Cisel, Matthieu
Interactions that take place between MOOC users outside of discussion forums, and out of the reach of course designers, have received little attention from the scientific community despite their potential influence on ...
Match: interactions; mooc
Crowdsourcing MOOC interactions: Using a social media site cMOOC to engage students in university course activities
Ostashewski, Nathaniel; Howell, Jennifer; Dron, Jon
This paper reports on a study of the utilization of a connectivist-style Massive Open Course, or cMOOC, to engage students in online activities that were part of a first-year School of Education course. A customized ...
Match: interactions; mooc
Merging MOOC and mLearning for increased learner interactions
de Waard, Inge; Koutropoulos, Apostolos; Hogue, Rebecca J.; Abajian, Sean C.; et al.
In this paper, the authors suggest the merger of the Massively Open Online Course (MOOC) format and mobile learning (mLearning) based on mutual affordances of both contemporary learning/teaching formats to investigate ...
Match: interactions; mooc
How much OOO in your MOOC?
Kuna, Maja; Parrish, Patrick
Il formato MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) continua a creare numerose riflessioni, soprattutto in merito alla sua capacità di raggiungere tanti utenti contemporaneamente e all’uso innovativo delle nuove tecnologie. ...
Match: distance learning; mooc
Perceived resources and technology acceptance model (PRATAM): Students' acceptance of e-Learning in Mathematics
Tarmuji, Nor Habibah; Ahmad, Salimah; Abdullah, Nur Hidayah Masni; Nassir, Asyura Abd; et al.
The methods of teaching in class are also affected with the rise of technology used in education. The lecturer or instructor may want to use innovative ways of teaching to capture the students' attention and to make the ...
Match: blended learning; mooc
Practical skills in AutoCAD through a mass open online course
Kaygorodtseva, Natalia; Luzgina, Valeriia; Cocchiarella, Luigi
Mass open online courses (MOOC) are popular recently. Their advantages are obvious: training at any time, from anywhere in the world, from the best teachers, with the help of quality content. But is it possible to learn ...
Match: distance learning; mooc
What have they done with the MOOCs?! The impact of MOOCs on Campus Education
Cabral, Pedro; van Valkenburg, Willem; Dopper, Sofia; Ubachs, George; Konings, Lizzie
Overview of papers on enhancement of European Higher Education as presented during the Online, Open and Flexible Higher Education Conference in Rome, October 2016
In 2013 Delft University of Technology (TU Delft) ...
Match: blended learning; mooc
Integrating a MOOC into the MA curriculum: An ‘expert’ student’s reflections on blended learning
Phi, Minh Tuan; Orsini-Jones, Marina; Smith, Simon
Autonomy is a highly debated concept in the field of language learning and teaching. It is argued here that the integration of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in tertiary education can help language teachers and ...
Match: blended learning; mooc
Massive Open Online Courses: Innovation in education?
Siemens, George; McGreal, Rory; Kinuthia, Wanjira; Marshall, Stewart
Match: distance learning; mooc
Adopting MOOCs on campus: A collaborative effort to test MOOCs on campuses of the University System of Maryland
Griffiths, Rebecca; Chingos, Matthew; Spies, Richard; Mulhern, Christine
To address the paucity of data on the use of MOOCs in “traditional” postsecondary institutions, Ithaka S+R and the University System of Maryland studied the feasibility of repurposing MOOCs for use in hybrid, ...
Match: blended learning; mooc