Opening up education the collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge
McMartin, F.

Published2008
PeriodicalChapter Open educational content: Transforming access to education, Pages 135-147
PublisherMIT Press
EditorsIiyoshi, Toru and Kumar, M. S. V.

ABSTRACT
Today, people world-wide have access via the Internet to information and artifacts of knowledgeby which I mean the textual, visual, and audio works that embody knowledge. They access this widely available range of resources to learn, and in so learning, apply knowledge and thereby change some part of their lives. This is a perfectly reasonable example of open educational content, in that by accessing knowledge, an end-user accomplishes an educational goal. But defi nitions are controlled by those who make them. UNESCO has defi ned open content as part of the broader conceptual movement of open educational resources (OER), where content is described as digitized educational materials and tools freely offered for educators, students and self-learners to use and reuse for the purposes of teaching, learning, and research (2002). Others have defi ned open content and open educational resources differently and more simply, emphasizing the practical perhaps more than the theoretical by describing open educational content and resources as digital learning objects, such as small (relative to the size of an entire course) instructional components that can be reused a number of times in different learning contexts . . . deliverable over the Internet . . . any number of people can access and use them simultaneously (as opposed to traditional instructional media, such as an overhead or videotape, which can only exist in one place at a time) (Wiley, 2000). Still others, especially members of the digital library world, view open content as being anything used for educational purposes, usually free, that someone has posted to a managed collection of learning materials and resources such as MERLOT or the National Science Digital Library (NSDL). For the purposes of this overview, I will 136 Chapter 9 use the term open educational content to describe actual contents as well as the projects that provide and support the generation and distribution of that content. I have characterized these defi nitions with sweeping brush strokes to a) give you a fl avor of what we mean by educational content in the context of this collection and b) to give you the lay of the land. As you engage with the authors of the following chapters, you will fi nd that their defi nitions of open content, while generally consistent with the defi nitions above, contain nuances, caveats, and exceptions to these defi nitions. All agree, though, that open content relates to knowledge. You will also fi nd in their descriptions that content derives meaning only from within a context (formal or informal learning), community (target audience for the learning), and purpose (ranging from educational change in local settings to changing education world-wide). These later dimensions of the defi nitions are extremely important, for they represent the challenges that open content providers must meet in order for the OER movement to succeed. If Content Is King, Then Why Are the Context, Community, and Purpose So Darn Important? Content is King, or so Internet mythology supports. A simple Google search of Content is King results in a standard Google return of millions of hits. Yet, just as the fi rst result (Callen, 2007) claims in its title that content is the most important aspect of a Web site, since the Internet

Keywords MERLOT · MIT · OCW · OER adoption · OER perceptions

Languageeng
ISBN9780262033718
URLhttp://mitpress.mit.edu/books/chapters/0262033712chap9.pdf
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar


Viewed by 107 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

Our history
MIT
In 1999, MIT Faculty considered how to use the Internet in pursuit of MIT's mission—to advance knowledge and educate students—and in 2000 proposed OCW. MIT published the first proof-of-concept site in 2002, ...
Match: MIT; OCW

Open source resources in education: Opportunities and challenges
Friesen, Norm
The education community has been at the forefront in envisioning and conceptualizing infrastructures intended for utilizing and sharing digital content or resources. However, this community has faced challenges in ...
Match: MIT; OCW

A review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities
Atkins, Daniel E.; Brown, John Seely; Hammond, Allen L.
Section one, OER history, structure and definition. Section two, we will review the portfolio of OER grants to date in the context of the overall Technology/Open Educational Resources Logic Model and the description ...
Match: MIT; OCW

OER Readiness in Africa: A report submitted to the OLnet Project, August 201
Ngimwa, Pauline
The aim of this small scale project was to assess Africa’s readiness to adopt OER. This involved an assessment of the technical and human related factors. By technical factors the study was to look at the status of ...
Match: technology; OER perceptions

MIT OpenCourseWare 2009 Program Evaluation Findings Summary
MIT
Match: MIT

MIT to Make Nearly All Course Materials Available Free on the World Wide Web
MIT
Match: MIT

Shaping the path to digital: The Indiana University eTexts initiative
Wheeler, Brad; Osborne, Nik; Oblinger, Diana. G.
The rising cost of college textbooks has long been a burden for students, often motivating them to seek creative ways to get around this expense. Though digital textbooks—with their ability to provide cheaper, easier, ...
Match: technology

Systematic mapping study of academic engagement in MOOC
Guajardo Leal, Brenda Edith; Navarro-Corona, Claudia
MOOCs are presented as an affordable and easily accessible modality that offers the opportunity to democratize education in our time; however, this convenience training favors a low completion rate of the participants. ...
Match: technology

Open Education Resources (OER) for assessment and credit for students project: Towards a logic model and plan for action
Mackintosh, Wayne; McGreal, Rory; Taylor, J.
The Open Education Resource (OER) for assessment and credit for students initiative aims to develop a “parallel learning universe” to augment and add value to existing post-secondary education provision by creating ...
Match: technology

Using Rogersʼ Theory of Perceived Attributes as a framework for understanding the challenges of adoption of open educational resources
Perkins, Ross A.
Over the last decade, the word open has also been used to describe educational resources (OERs) and courseware (OCW). The word open, as used here, refers at one level to the fact that the end user does not pay to access ...
Match: technology