Student success prediction in MOOCs
Published | June 2018 |
Journal | User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 127-203 |
Publisher | Springer Netherlands |
Country | United States, North America |
ABSTRACT
Predictive models of student success in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are a critical component of effective content personalization and adaptive interventions. In this article we review the state of the art in predictive models of student success in MOOCs and present a categorization of MOOC research according to the predictors (features), prediction (outcomes), and underlying theoretical model. We critically survey work across each category, providing data on the raw data source, feature engineering, statistical model, evaluation method, prediction architecture, and other aspects of these experiments. Such a review is particularly useful given the rapid expansion of predictive modeling research in MOOCs since the emergence of major MOOC platforms in 2012. This survey reveals several key methodological gaps, which include extensive filtering of experimental subpopulations, ineffective student model evaluation, and the use of experimental data which would be unavailable for real-world student success prediction and intervention, which is the ultimate goal of such models. Finally, we highlight opportunities for future research, which include temporal modeling, research bridging predictive and explanatory student models, work which contributes to learning theory, and evaluating long-term learner success in MOOCs.Keywords | learning analytics · model evaluation · MOOC · predictive modeling |
Published at | Netherlands |
ISSN | 1573-1391 |
Refereed | Yes |
Rights | © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 |
DOI | 10.1007/s11257-018-9203-z |
Export options | BibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar |
Viewed by 49 distinct readers
CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS
The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.










Click a star to be the first to rate this document
▶ POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS
Grit and intention: Why do learners complete MOOCs?
Wang, Yuan; Baker, Ryan
In recent years there has been considerable interest in how many learners complete MOOCs, and what factors during usage can predict completion. Others, however, have argued that many learners never intend to complete ...
Match: learning analytics; MOOC; United States; North America
MOOCs: Expectations and reality: Full report
Hollands, Fiona M.; Tirthali, Devayani
The Question: Do MOOCs cost-effectively produce desirable educational outcomes compared to face-to-face and other online options?
The Study: Based on extensive research and interviews, The Centre for Benefit-Cost ...
Match: MOOC; United States; North America
Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States
Allen, Elaine I.; Seaman, Jeff
Grade Change: Tracking Online Education in the United States is the eleventh annual report on
the state of online learning among higher education institutions in the United States. The study is
aimed at answering some ...
Match: MOOC; United States; North America
The "Promises" of higher education: Access
Campaign for the Future of Higher Education
The “promise” that online learning will dramatically expand access to higher education is at the center of the recent push in the MOOC/Online movement. This paper examines research that can help us answer a crucial ...
Match: MOOC; United States; North America
Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses
Kizilcec, René F.; Piech, Chris; Schneider, Emily
As MOOCs grow in popularity, the relatively low completion rates of learners has been a central criticism. This focus on completion rates, however, reflects a monolithic view of disengagement that does not allow MOOC ...
Match: MOOC; United States; North America
Alexander the MOOC lands
Rogers, Guy M.
Almost four months ago my EdX/WellesleyX course, “Was Alexander Great?” was launched to test three questions about online education: whether a Massive Open Online Course could be as intellectually rigorous as a ...
Match: MOOC; United States; North America
Analysis of 450 MOOC-based microcredentials reveals many options but little consistency
Pickard, Laurie
One trend Class Central has been keeping tabs on in the MOOC and online learning space is the rise of microcredentials. A microcredential is any one of a number of new certifications that covers more than a single ...
Match: MOOC; United States; North America
What are MOOCs?
Waks, Leonard J.
The large MOOC platforms were introduced against the background of the occupational and educational crises after 2008. The first Massive Open Online Courses, or MOOCs, were introduced in 2007 and entered the higher ...
Match: MOOC; United States; North America
HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses: Fall 2012-summer 2013
Ho, Andrew Dean; Reich, Justin; Nesterko, Sergiy O.; Seaton, Daniel Thomas; et al.
HarvardX and MITx are collaborative institutional efforts between Harvard University and MIT to enhance campus-based education, advance educational research, and increase access to online learning opportunities ...
Match: MOOC; United States; North America
Negotiation and conflict resolution education in the age of the MOOC
Ebner, Noam
Even as online learning is increasingly embraced by institutions of higher education, the past decade has seen the arrival of yet another new educational vehicle: massive online open courses (MOOCs). These courses are ...
Match: MOOC; United States; North America