Assessment in Massive Open Online Courses
Admiraal, Wilfried · Pilli, Olga · Huisman, Bart

PublishedApril 2015
JournalElectronic Journal of e-Learning
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 207-216

ABSTRACT
Open online distance learning in higher education has quickly gained popularity, expanded, and evolved, with Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) as the most recent development. New web technologies allow for scalable ways to deliver video lect ure content, implement social forums and track student progress in MOOCs. However, we remain limited in our ability to assess complex and open‑ended student assignments. In this paper, we present a study on various forms of assessment and their relationsh ip with the final exam score. In general, the reliability of both the self‑assessments and the peer assessments was high. Based on low correlations with final exam grades as well as with other assessment forms, we conclude that self‑assessments might not be a valid way to assess students performance in MOOCs. Yet the weekly quizzes and peer assessment significantly explained differences in students final exam scores, with one of the weekly quizzes as the strongest explanatory variable. We suggest that both self‑assessment and peer assessment would better be used as assessment for learning instead of assessment of learning. Future research on MOOCs implies a reconceptualization of education variables, including the role of assessment of students achiev ements.

Keywords assessment · higher education · MOOC · open online learning · peer assessment · self-assessment

ISSN1479-4403
RefereedYes
RightsCopyright © 2003-2016 Electronic Journal of e-Learning
URLhttp://www.ejel.org/issue/download.html?idArticle=431
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar



AVAILABLE FILES
ejel-volume13-issue4-article431.pdf · 373.9KB81 downloads



Viewed by 157 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses: Fall 2012-summer 2013
Ho, Andrew Dean; Reich, Justin; Nesterko, Sergiy O.; Seaton, Daniel Thomas; et al.
HarvardX and MITx are collaborative institutional efforts between Harvard University and MIT to enhance campus-based education, advance educational research, and increase access to online learning opportunities ...
Match: courses; higher education; mooc

Validation of non-formal MOOC-based learning: An analysis of assessment and recognition practices in Europe (OpenCred)
Witthaus, Gabi; dos Santos, Andreia Inamorato; Childs, Mark; Tannhauser, Anne-Christin; et al.
This report presents the outcomes of research, conducted between May 2014 and November 2015, into emerging practices in assessment, credentialisation and recognition in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Following ...
Match: assessment; higher education; mooc

An Examination of Presage, Process and Product Dimensions in Massive Open Online Courses
Çelik, Berkan
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have made a great progress around the world in the recent years. Bilgeİş Online Learning Portal (bilgeis.net) is one of the most comprehensive MOOC portals providing pdMOOCs ...
Match: courses; mooc

Assessment approaches in massive open online courses: Possibilities, challenges and future directions
Xiong, Yao; Suen, Hoi K.
The development of massive open online courses (MOOCs) has launched an era of large-scale interactive participation in education. While massive open enrolment and the advances of learning technology are creating ...
Match: assessment; courses; peer assessment

Recommendations on Formative Assessment and Feedback Practices for stronger engagement in MOOCs
Floratos, Nikolaos; Guasch, Teresa; Espasa, Anna; Gil-Jaurena, Inés
Many publications and surveys refer to the high drop out rate in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) which is around 90%, especially if we compare the number of students who register against those who finish. Working ...
Match: assessment; peer assessment

Student engagement in massive open online courses
Sinclair, Jane; Kalvala, Sara
Completion rates in massive open online courses (MOOCs) are disturbingly low. Existing analysis has focused on patterns of resource access and prediction of drop-out using learning analytics. In contrast, the ...
Match: courses; higher education

Peer assessment for massive open online courses (MOOCs)
Suen, Hoi; McGreal, Rory; Conrad, Dianne
The teach-learn-assess cycle in education is broken in a typical massive open online course (MOOC). Without formative assessment and feedback, MOOCs amount to information dump or broadcasting shows, not educational ...
Match: assessment; courses; mooc; peer assessment

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in Sub-Saharan African Higher Education Landscape: A Bibliometric Review
Yunusa, Abdullahi Abubakar; Umar, Irfan Naufal; Bervell, Brandford; Cvetković, Dragan Mladen
In this study, we examined articles focused on Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) implemented in the sub-Saharan African (SSA) Higher Education context that describes the different models of MOOCs enacted as an ...
Match: courses; higher education; mooc

Architecture of a MOOC: Assessment
Prabhakar, T V
Week 2: Architecture of a MOOC, module 4 of the MOOC on MOOC course offered by the Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK) & Commonwealth of Learning (COL) in September 2014. This resource contains a video link, ...
Match: assessment; mooc

HarvardX and MITx: Two years of open online courses Fall 2012-Summer 2014
Ho, Andrew Dean; Chuang, Isaac; Reich, Justin; Coleman, Cody Austun; et al.
What happens when well-known universities offer online courses, assessments, and certificates of completion for free? Early descriptions of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have emphasized large enrollments, low ...
Match: courses; higher education; mooc