The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
Open Educational Resources: Mainstream adoption and educational effectiveness
William and Flora Hewlett Foundation [corporate]

Alternate titleThe William and Flora Hewlett Foundation Draft for Public Comment
PublishedApril 2011
PeriodicalPages 1-26

ABSTRACT
The idea behind OER is simple but powerful—educational materials made freely available on the Internet for anyone to use, distribute, and revise. These digital materials have the potential to give people everywhere equal access to humanity’s greatest achievements and to transform teaching and learning through rapid feedback loops and personalized learning. Anyone can tap educational experiences once reserved for students at elite universities and schools. Anyone can translate these resources, enhance their cultural relevance, improve them pedagogically, and integrate them into innovative new approaches to education. Knowledge once locked behind the gates of tuition and tradition can be made available to all.

To realize that promise, however, OER must bridge the chasm between enthusiastic early adopters and an education community wary of new technology. Over the next several years the Foundation plans to help pave the way for the OER movement to reach millions of people worldwide and play a central role in improving the way we teach and learn.

This draft white paper presents the Education Program’s theory of change for helping OER move into mainstream education and describes how the Program proposes to structure and time its investments to achieve its goal. It answers four key questions:

1. Why is Hewlett committed to continued investment in OER?
Since the Hewlett Foundation began investing in OER in 2002, the field has blossomed from the seed of an idea into a global movement. Now, for the first time, OER is poised to alter the course of mainstream education, changing the nature of schooling for students, self-taught learners, educators, and institutions around the world.

2. What will success look like?
By 2017 OER will be increasingly integrated into the educational mainstream, improving the effectiveness of education at all levels throughout the U.S. and around the globe. OER producers will supply high quality, personalized instructional materials for the most basic subjects and most popular credit-bearing courses in K-12 schools and colleges within the United States. At the same time, key OER providers around the globe will be on a path to sustainability, with funding from governments, other philanthropies, institutions, and private sources.

3. What investments are needed to achieve this goal?
The Program envisions investing in the infrastructure required for mainstream adoption of OER and the transformation of teaching and learning. Once in place, the OER infrastructure will deliver a high quality supply of educational content, promote supportive policies, and develop practical standards for OER materials. The Program also aims to underwrite research and support opportunistic innovation.

4. How will the plan be implemented?
The Program hopes to continue strategic investments in OER in close cooperation with other funders. Over time the Program might shift its spending priorities from an early focus on supply to a strong push for policy change and standards adoption, accompanied by funding for innovation throughout the strategy. The Program will refine a set of outcome-focused metrics and targets to track its progress, and time shifts in priorities.

Keywords accessibility · adoption · K-12 · OER adoption · OER definition · OER standards · open education · policy

Languageen
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar



AVAILABLE FILES
11 05 06 HEWLETT White paper.pdf · 337.8KB6 downloads



Viewed by 6 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

2017 State of the commons - Creative commons
The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation; Anonymous; Arcadia Fund; Argosy Foundation; et al.
This year’s highlights include the launch of the CC Certificates program, the Bassel Khartabil Memorial Fund and Fellowship (awarded at the Global Summit), the new Rights Back Resource for creators to reclaim their ...
Match: open education

Background and action paper on OER: A background and action paper for staff of bilateral and multilateral organizations at the strategic institutional education sector level
West, Paul G.; Victor, Lorraine; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
Match: William and Flora Hewlett Foundation; K-12; OER definition; policy

Post-secondary network to develop pathways to academic credit using OER
Mackintosh, Wayne; OER Foundation; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
Executive Summary (partial) The reporting period covers the six months from 1 January 2015 to 30 June 2015 corresponding with the 2nd year of the OERu's consolidation phase. Key achievements during the reporting ...
Match: William and Flora Hewlett Foundation

OERu Open Educational Resource University - Towards a logic model and plan for action
Day, Robin; Ker, Phil; Mackintosh, Wayne; McGreal, Rory; et al.
Match: adoption; policy

Growing the Curriculum: Open Education Resources in U.S. higher education
Allen, Elaine I.; Seaman, Jeff; Babson Survey Research; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation; Pearson
Open educational resources (OER) have been defined by the Hewlett Foundation as teaching, learning, and research resources that reside in the public domain or have been released under an intellectual property license ...
Match: William and Flora Hewlett Foundation; OER adoption

5 Things You Should Know About the OER University Network Plan
Open Education Resource Foundation
Match: OER definition; policy

William & Flora Hewlett Foundation/COL open education resources for open schools
Bialobrzeska, Maryla; Hellmann, Liora; Moore, Andrew
The project has been developed for a range of stakeholders including the funder, the COL project team, the country consultants and the teachers.Specifically, for the funder, the report provides an analysis of the ...
Match: William and Flora Hewlett Foundation; foundation; policy

A review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities
Atkins, Daniel E.; Brown, John Seely; Hammond, Allen L.
Section one, OER history, structure and definition. Section two, we will review the portfolio of OER grants to date in the context of the overall Technology/Open Educational Resources Logic Model and the description ...
Match: William and Flora Hewlett Foundation; K-12; OER definition

Open Education Resource Foundation Annual Report 2011
Open Education Resource (OER) Foundation
  Topics include: Chairman's overview, Board of Directors, Corporate governance, OER Foundation operations, WikiEducator, OER Tertiary Education Network, OERu founding anchor partners, OER Foundation ...
Match: foundation

Foundation funded OER vs. tax payer funded OER -A tale of two mandates
Stacey, Paul
Compare and contrast foundation funded OER with taxpayer funded OER in terms of global vs. local goals, licensing options, use cases, and outcomes.
Match: foundation; adoption