The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
Understanding learning and teaching in MOOCs from the perspectives of students and instructors: A review of literature from 2014 to 2016
Deng, Ruiqi · Benckendorff, Pierre · Gannaway, Deanne

PublishedMay 2017
Conference5th European MOOCs Stakeholders Summit, EMOOCs 2017, Madrid, Spain, May 22-26, 2017, Digital Education: Out to the World and Back to the Campus
SeriesLecture Notes in Computer Science
Edition 1, Volume 10254, Pages 176-181
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
EditorsKloos, Carlos Delgado · Jermann, Patrick · Pérez-Sanagustín, Mar · Seaton, Daniel T. · White, Su
CountrySpain, Europe

ABSTRACT
This article presents the results of a literature review on key learning and teaching dimensions in MOOCs. 95 studies published from January 2014 to October 2016 were selected for review. Four important learning and teaching dimensions were identified, and relationships between these dimensions were presented. The key dimensions and sub-dimensions reported in this literature review are student factors (education background, country of origin, age, gender, and motivation), teaching context (motivation, challenge, and pedagogical preference), student engagement (emotional, social, behavioural, and cognitive engagement), and learning outcomes (perception, retention, and grade). The review provides evidence of a relationship between student factors and engagement and a relationship between student engagement and learning outcomes.

Keywords literature review · MOOC · student instructor

Published atMadrid
ISBN978-3-319-59044-8
RefereedYes
Rights© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
DOI10.1007/978-3-319-59044-8_20
URLhttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-59044-8_20
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar


Viewed by 384 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

Exploring MOOC from education and Information Systems perspectives: a short literature review
Saadatdoost, Robab; Sim, Alex Tze Hiang; Jafarkarimi, Hosein; Mei Hee, Jee
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have gained significance as a new paradigm in education. MOOCs are open to any interested person and provide education products for a scalable number of learners who have access to ...
Match: perspectives; literature review

Tagging OER for skills profiling: User perspectives and interactions at no cost
Kawachi, Paul; Yin, Shuangxu
This Paper reports our research on how open educational resources (OER) should be labelled not only with social tagging but also for skills profiling. We have previously reported the need for wider use of skills ...
Match: perspectives

What we teach: K-12 school district curriculum adoption process, 2017
Allen, Elaine I.; Seaman, Jeff
Over three-quarters of K-12 districts have made at least one full-course curricula adoption decision over the past three years, with the need to meet changing standards driving most of these decisions, according to the ...

Understanding learner autonomy through MOOC-supported blended learning environments: An investigation into Chinese MA ELT students’ beliefs
Jiao, Yan; Orsini-Jones, Marina; Smith, Simon
This short paper attempts to investigate how the FutureLearn2 Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) blend, integrated into the module Theories, Methods, and Approaches of Language Learning and Teaching on the Master of Arts ...
Match: understanding; Europe

Understanding motivational system in open learning: Learners' engagement with a Traditional Chinese-based open educational resource system
Huang, Wenhao David; Wu, Chorng-Guang
Learning has embraced the ``open'' process in recent years, as many educational resources are made available for free online. Existing research, however, has not provided sufficient evidence to systematically improve ...
Match: understanding

Expanding approaches for understanding impact: integrating technology, curriculum, and open educational resources in science education.
Ye, Lei; Recker, Mimi; Walker, Andrew; Leary, Heather; Yuan, Min
This article reports results from a scale-up study of the impact of a software tool designed to support teachers in the digital learning era. This tool, the Curriculum Customization Service (CCS), enables teachers to ...
Match: understanding

Bridging the gap: Rural librarians’ journey to understanding students’ role in OER outreach
Langdon, Amanda N.; Parker, Katherine E.
Literature detailing how small, rural academic institutions have implemented initiatives for Open Educational Resources (OER) is limited; most articles focus on university systems, state schools, and R1 research ...
Match: understanding

User-oriented quality for OER: understanding teachers' views on re-use, quality, and trust
Clements, K I.; Pawlowski, J M.
We analysed how teachers as users of open educational resources (OER) repositories act in the re-use process and how they perceive quality. Based on a quantitative empirical study, we also surveyed which quality ...
Match: understanding

“I find the whole enterprise daunting”: Staff understanding of Open Education initiatives within a UK university
Harold, Sinead; Rolfe, Vivien
“Open” initiatives, which focus on increasing access to education, resources, and research, are often practised by individuals rather than universities. However, universities must now produce openly accessible ...
Match: understanding; Europe

User consent in MOOCs – Micro, meso, and macro perspectives
Khalil, Mohammad; Prinsloo, Paul; Slade, Sharon
While many strategies for protecting personal privacy rely on regulatory frameworks, consent, and anonymizing data, they are not always effective. Terms and Conditions often lag behind advances in technology, software, ...
Match: perspectives