The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
Learning challenges in higher education: An analysis of contradictions within Open Educational Practice
Kaatrakoski, Heli · Littlejohn, Allison · Hood, Nina

PublishedOctober 2016
JournalHigher Education
Issue 24, Pages 1-17
PublisherSpringer Netherlands

Open education, including the use of open educational resources (OER) and the adoption of open education practice, has the potential to challenge educators to change their practice in fundamental ways. This paper forms part of a larger study focusing on higher education educators’ learning from and through their engagement with OER. The first part of the study was a quantitative survey investigating educators’ learning behaviour when they learned to use OER in their practice. The second part of the study explored qualitatively how educators engaged with OER and how they conceptualised their learning. Data were gathered through interviews with 30 higher education educators. This paper reports the analysis of these interviews. The analysis draws on the theory of self-regulated learning and cultural–historical activity theory to explore the challenges adult education practitioners encounter when changing their practice. The study tests the application of a framework that traces the discursive manifestations of contradictions, exploring how this framework can be used to examine different aspects of self-regulated learning as educators learn how to use OER. We have identified three distinct tensions in higher education educators’ practice: tensions between the emerging needs of the individual (as he or she adopts new forms of practice) and organisational policies; between the transfer of responsibilities from educators to students as new practice is embedded and institutional accountability; and between cost efficiency and learning objectives. The framework for the discursive manifestations of contradictions was a useful tool used to surface these apparent tensions.

Keywords change in practice · higher education educators · manifestations of contradictions · Open Educational Resources · self-regulated learning

Rights© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016
Other informationHigh Educ
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar

Viewed by 66 distinct readers


The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


Massive open online courses: A traditional or transformative approach to learning
Vale, Katie; Littlejohn, Allison; Littlejohn, Allison; Pegler, Chris
This chapter examines potential benefits and limitations of MOOCs, using a case example of a major MOOC initiative:edX. This chapter begins by examining conflicting perspectives around MOOCs from the literature. Then ...
Match: Littlejohn, Allison

Open, lifewide learning: A vision
Littlejohn, Allison; Falconer, Isobel; McGill, Lou; Littlejohn, Allison; Pegler, Chris
Match: Littlejohn, Allison

The many guises of MOOCs
Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) often are viewed as synonymous with innovation and openness. In this chapter, we trace their origins and varied manifestations and the ways they are understood. We interrogate the ...
Match: Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina

Quality in MOOCs: Surveying the terrain
Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison
The purpose of this review is to identify quality measures and to highlight some of the tensions surrounding notions of quality, as well as the need for new ways of thinking about and approaching quality in MOOCs. It ...
Match: Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina

Designing for quality?
Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
There are significant complexities in interpreting and measuring quality in MOOCs. In this chapter, we examine experts' perceptions of how to measure quality in MOOCs, using empirical data we gathered through ...
Match: Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina

The [un]democratisation of education and learning
Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
MOOCs have engendered excitement around their potential to democratise education. They appear to act as a leveller and offer equal opportunity to millions of learners worldwide. Yet, this alluring promise is not wholly ...
Match: Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina

Massive numbers, diverse learning
Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
MOOCs provide education for millions of people worldwide. Though it is not clear whether everyone can learn in a MOOC. Building on the typology of MOOC participants introduced is in Chap. 3 , and we explore the claim ...
Match: Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina

MOOC Quality: The need for new measures
Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison
MOOCs are re-operationalising traditional concepts in education. While they draw on elements of existing educational and learning models, they represent a new approach to instruction and learning. The challenges MOOCs ...
Match: Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina

The emancipated learner? The tensions facing learners in massive, open learning
Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
MOOCs have the potential to challenge existing educational models. Paradoxically, they frequently reinforce educational conventions by requiring the learners to conform to expected norms of current educational models. ...
Match: Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina

Knowledge typologies for professional learning: Educators’ (re)generation of knowledge when learning open educational practice
Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison
Open education resources (OER) and accompanying open education practices(OEP), are changing the education landscape. For educators to take full advantage of the opportunities OER offer they must engage in learning ...
Match: Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina