The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
Quality in MOOCs: Surveying the terrain
Hood, Nina and Littlejohn, Allison

PublishedJune 2016
PeriodicalPages 1-40
PublisherCommonwealth of Learning
CountryCanada

ABSTRACT
The purpose of this review is to identify quality measures and to highlight some of the tensions surrounding notions of quality, as well as the need for new ways of thinking about and approaching quality in MOOCs. It draws on the literature on both MOOCs and quality in education more generally in order to provide a framework for thinking about quality and the different variables and questions that must be considered when conceptualising quality in MOOCs. The review adopts a relativist approach, positioning quality as a measure for a specific purpose. The review draws upon Biggs’s (1993) 3P model to explore notions and dimensions of quality in relation to MOOCs — presage, process and product variables — which correspond to an input–environment–output model. The review brings together literature examining how quality should be interpreted and assessed in MOOCs at a more general and theoretical level, as well as empirical research studies that explore how these ideas about quality can be operationalised, including the measures and instruments that can be employed. What emerges from the literature are the complexities involved in interpreting and measuring quality in MOOCs and the importance of both context and perspective to discussions of quality.

Keywords instructional design · MOOC · MOOC pedagogy · MOOC quality

Published atBurnaby
ISBN978-1-894975-80-3
RefereedDoes not apply
Rights© 2016 by the Commonwealth of Learning Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence (international)
URLhttp://hdl.handle.net/11599/2352
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar



AVAILABLE FILES
2015_QualityinMOOCs-Surveying-the-Terrain.pdf · 521KB24 downloads



Viewed by 7 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

MOOC Quality: The need for new measures
Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison
MOOCs are re-operationalising traditional concepts in education. While they draw on elements of existing educational and learning models, they represent a new approach to instruction and learning. The challenges MOOCs ...
Match: Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison; quality

Designing for quality?
Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
There are significant complexities in interpreting and measuring quality in MOOCs. In this chapter, we examine experts' perceptions of how to measure quality in MOOCs, using empirical data we gathered through ...
Match: Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison; MOOC

Massive numbers, diverse learning
Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
MOOCs provide education for millions of people worldwide. Though it is not clear whether everyone can learn in a MOOC. Building on the typology of MOOC participants introduced is in Chap. 3 , and we explore the claim ...
Match: Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison; MOOC

Massive open online courses: A traditional or transformative approach to learning
Vale, Katie; Littlejohn, Allison; Littlejohn, Allison; Pegler, Chris
This chapter examines potential benefits and limitations of MOOCs, using a case example of a major MOOC initiative:edX. This chapter begins by examining conflicting perspectives around MOOCs from the literature. Then ...
Match: Littlejohn, Allison; MOOC

The [un]democratisation of education and learning
Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
MOOCs have engendered excitement around their potential to democratise education. They appear to act as a leveller and offer equal opportunity to millions of learners worldwide. Yet, this alluring promise is not wholly ...
Match: Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison; MOOC quality

Open, lifewide learning: A vision
Littlejohn, Allison; Falconer, Isobel; McGill, Lou; Littlejohn, Allison; Pegler, Chris
Match: Littlejohn, Allison

Knowledge typologies for professional learning: Educators’ (re)generation of knowledge when learning open educational practice
Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison
Open education resources (OER) and accompanying open education practices(OEP), are changing the education landscape. For educators to take full advantage of the opportunities OER offer they must engage in learning ...
Match: Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison

Learning challenges in higher education: An analysis of contradictions within Open Educational Practice
Kaatrakoski, Heli; Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
Open education, including the use of open educational resources (OER) and the adoption of open education practice, has the potential to challenge educators to change their practice in fundamental ways. This paper forms ...
Match: Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison

The many guises of MOOCs
Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) often are viewed as synonymous with innovation and openness. In this chapter, we trace their origins and varied manifestations and the ways they are understood. We interrogate the ...
Match: Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison

The emancipated learner? The tensions facing learners in massive, open learning
Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
MOOCs have the potential to challenge existing educational models. Paradoxically, they frequently reinforce educational conventions by requiring the learners to conform to expected norms of current educational models. ...
Match: Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison