Beyond objective testing and peer assessment: Alternative ways of assessment in MOOCs
Translated title | Más allá de las pruebas objetivas y la evaluación por pares: alternativas de evaluación en los MOOC |
Published | January 2015 |
Journal | RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 119-131 |
Original Publication | Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento |
Country | Spain |
ABSTRACT
MOOCs (massive open online courses) are an online teaching proposal that, in their short lives, have already thrown up two very different possibilities: cMOOCs and xMOOCs. Both are analysed in this paper from the perspective of assessing students’ learning. While assessment in xMOOCs is usually limited to multiple choice tests and sometimes delivering tasks, in cMOOCs the aim is to foster interaction from an educational standpoint, usually on the basis of peer assessment. Pedagogically, both models have their limitations. Multiple choice tests are mainly content bound while peer assessment has its own difficulties and drawbacks, which we explain here. We will put forward some useful ideas to give more flexibility to assessment in MOOCs (groups of experts, semantic web, portfolio, learning analytics), in an attempt to address educational assessment not as an end in itself but as another part of the educational process.Los MOOC (cursos masivos abiertos en línea) son una propuesta de enseñanza en línea que en su corta vida han mostrado ya dos posibilidades bien diferenciadas, los cMOOC y los xMOOC. Ambas son analizadas en este artículo desde la perspectiva de la evaluación de los aprendizajes de los alumnos, pues mientras que en los xMOOC la evaluación suele aparecer reducida a pruebas tipo test o en algunos casos a la entrega de tareas, en los cMOOC la evaluación pretende promover la interacción desde una perspectiva de evaluación formativa y suele sustentarse en la evaluación por pares. Ambos modelos pueden resultar limitados desde una perspectiva pedagógica. Por una parte, los exámenes tipo test se circunscriben principalmente al contenido y, por otro lado, la evaluación por pares tiene también dificultades e inconvenientes que explicamos en el artículo. Así, en este artículo presentamos diversas alternativas útiles para flexibilizar las posibilidades de evaluación en los MOOC (grupos de expertos, web semántica, portafolio, analíticas de aprendizaje), intentando abordar la evaluación educativa no como una finalidad en sí misma, sino como una parte más del proceso educativo.
Keywords | assessment · e-learning · evaluación · feedback |
Published at | Barcelona |
ISSN | 1698-580X |
Refereed | Yes |
Rights | by/3.0/es/deed.en |
DOI | 10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2262 |
Other information | RUSC. Univ. and Know. Soc. |
Export options | BibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar |
AVAILABLE FILES
Viewed by 58 distinct readers
CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS
The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.
Click a star to be the first to rate this document
▶ POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS
Presentation to UNCTAD's advisory group on "Developing skills, knowledge and capacities through innovation: E-Learning, M-Learning, cloud-Learning"
Downes, Stephen
Match: assessment; e-learning
MOOCs in Europe: Overview of papers representing a collective European response on MOOCs as presented during the HOME conference in Rome November 2015
Bang, Joergen; Dalsgaard, Christian; Kjaer, Arne; O’Donovan, Maria; et al.
Table of contents
Foreword
Part 1: Regional MOOC initiatives
Building OOC layers on top of existing courses
(M)OOCs in Iceland: Language and learning communities
EduOpen network in Italy
Part 2: Role media ...
Match: assessment; e-learning
Re-purposing an OER for the online language course: a case study of Deutsch Interaktiv by the Deutsche Welle
Dixon, Edward M.; Hondo, Junko
This paper will describe pedagogical approaches for re-purposing an open educational resource (OER) designed and produced by the Deutsche Welle. This free online program, Deutsch Interaktiv, consists of authentic ...
Match: assessment; feedback
Open recognition and its enemies (2) — No informal learning without informal recognition
Ravet, Serge
Match: assessment
Is peer review an appropriate form of assessment in a MOOC? Student participation and performance in formative peer review
Meek, Sarah E.M.; Blakemore, Louise; Marks, Leah
Many aspects of higher education must be reconceptualised for massive open online courses (MOOCs). Formative and summative assessment of qualitative work in particular requires novel approaches to cope with the numbers ...
Match: assessment
An ontology for open rubric exchange on the web
Panulla, Brian; Kohler, Megan
While the Internet has given educators access to a steady supply of Open Educational Resources, the educational rubrics commonly shared on the Web are generally in the form of static, non-semantic presentational ...
Match: assessment
What impacts do OER have on students? Students share their experiences with a health psychology OER at New York City College of Technology
Cooney, Cailean
This article reports findings from a study conducted with students in three sections of a Health Psychology course that replaced a traditional textbook with open educational resources (OER) as the primary course ...
Match: assessment
Brief report on Open Praxis figures and data (2017)
Inés Gil-Jaurena
In the first Open Praxis issue in 2018 we briefly report on some statistics and information about Open Praxis development. The report covers the period January 2013 - December 2017, with a special focus in volume 9, ...
Match: assessment
Developing a strategic approach to MOOCs
Ferguson, Rebecca; Scanlon, Eileen; Harris, Lisa
During the last eight years, interest in massive open online courses (MOOCs) has grown fast and continuously worldwide. Universities that had never engaged with open or online learning have begun to run courses in these ...
Match: assessment
Marking Open and Affordable Courses: Best Practices and Case Studies
Ainsworth, Breeman; Allen, Nicole; Dai, Jessica; Elder, Abbey; et al.
This collaboratively authored guide helps institutions navigate the uncharted waters of tagging course material as open educational resources (OER) or under a low-cost threshold by summarizing relevant state ...
Match: assessment