The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
Disruptor, distractor, or what? A policymaker's guide to Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS)
Kelly, Andrew P.

PublishedMay 2014
PeriodicalPages 1-46
PublisherBellwether Education Partners

ABSTRACT
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are a new form of digital learning that has enthralled some, infuriated others, and changed the conversation about higher education in the U.S. and abroad. Lost in this polarizing debate is a clear assessment of how this new medium is actually affecting postsecondary education and how it could be used in the future.

In this paper, Andrew P. Kelly clarifies the debate around the purpose and potential of MOOCs. Kelly argues that MOOCs are neither a panacea nor a passing fad, and instead, can serve as a tool for enhancing higher education and career training if properly deployed.

Kelly highlights four early lessons learned in the first few years of innovation with MOOCs. His analysis shows that despite predictions that MOOCs would become a substitute for traditional college courses, few students have actually redeemed MOOCs for college credit. Most of the students who register for MOOCs already have a college degree, are employed, and more interested in earning job skills than college credit. Likewise, efforts to use online courses to improve remedial education have disappointed.

On the other hand, the development of MOOC-enhanced hybrid models on traditional campuses could improve student outcomes and lower costs. Furthermore, MOOCs are well designed to close so-called skills gaps between what colleges teach and employers need. Employers have begun to partner with MOOC providers to create online career and technical training. Over time, MOOCs may change the way the American labor force builds its occupational skills.

Based on the experience with MOOCs to date Kelly identifies four key recommendations for policymakers:

* Deploy MOOCs strategically to improve the educational pipeline. Using low-cost open courses and assessments to diagnose academic needs could help students avoid remediation, while gifted students could benefit from access to MOOCs in high school.

* Reform articulation and finance policies to facilitate MOOCs-to-credit. Policymakers should push their state systems to adopt common course numbering, create small grants for low-cost credits, and link MOOCs to existing credit-by-exam programs.

* Challenge colleges to adopt hybrid models and use them to improve affordability. Policymakers should use the bully pulpit and competitive grants to encourage institutions to develop hybrid courses that reduce costs and keep tuition affordable.

* Extend MOOCs to other occupational training. Leaders should experiment with MOOCs as a low-cost complement to traditional workforce training programs, especially in fields where workers are in high demand.

* Clarify ownership of publicly funded content and maintain safe harbors for MOOC providers. Policymakers should work to ensure that content created with public dollars is openly licensed and freely available to state residents and that existing safe harbor provisions protect MOOCs from legal issues.

Keywords MOOC cost · MOOC history · MOOC policy · OER cost · OER history · OER policy · open education

RefereedDoes not apply
Rights© 2014 Bellwether Education Partners This report carries a Creative Commons license, which permits noncommercial re-use of content when proper attribution is provided. This means you are free to copy, display and distribute this work, or include content from this report in derivative works, under the following conditions: Attribution. You must clearly attribute the work to Bellwether Education Partners, and provide a link back to the publication at http://bellwethereducation.org/. Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes without explicit prior permission from Bellwether Education Partners. Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a license identical to this one. For the full legal code of this Creative Commons license, please visit www.creativecommons.org. If you have any questions about citing or reusing Bellwether Education Partners content, please contact us.
URLhttp://bellwethereducation.org/policymakers_guide_to_moocs
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar



AVAILABLE FILES
BW_MOOC_Final.pdf · 730.5KB41 downloads



Viewed by 62 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

MOOCs: Expectations and reality: Full report
Hollands, Fiona M.; Tirthali, Devayani
The Question: Do MOOCs cost-effectively produce desirable educational outcomes compared to face-to-face and other online options? The Study: Based on extensive research and interviews, The Centre for Benefit-Cost ...
Match: MOOC cost; MOOC policy; OER policy

The battle for open: How openness won and why it doesn’t feel like victory
Weller, M.
With the success of open access publishing, Massive open online courses (MOOCs) and open education practices, the open approach to education has moved from the periphery to the mainstream. This marks a moment of victory ...
Match: OER history; OER policy; open education

The open education handbook 2014
Farrow, Rob; Open Knowledge
"Open Education" is a topic which has become increasingly popular in a variety of contexts. This handbook has been written to provide a useful point of reference for readers with a range of different roles and interests ...
Match: OER history; OER policy; open education

Making sense of MOOCs: A guide for policy-makers in developing countries
Patru, Mariana; Balaji, Venkataraman
The Guide is designed to raise general awareness amongst policy makers in developing countries as to how Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) might address their concerns and priorities, particularly in terms of access ...
Match: MOOC policy; OER policy

eMundus regional report: New Zealand
Mackintosh, Wayne
...
Match: OER cost; OER policy

Open education
Pisutova, K.
Introduction to some concepts of openness in education. This presentation addresses concepts of Open Licensing (Creative Commons licenses), Open Content, Open Coursewere, Open Educational Resources, and Open Teaching ...
Match: open education

OER mainstreaming in Tonga
Abeywardena, Ishan; Uys, Philippus; Fifita, Seilosehina
In the race towards achieving the Education 2030 agenda, open educational resources (OER) act as a key enabler for sustainable development goal 4 (SDG4). Leading to the 2014 Regional Focal Points Meeting, Commonwealth ...
Match: OER policy; open education

Giving knowledge for free: The emergence of Open Educational Resources
Organization for Econcomic Co-operation and Development; Centre for Educational Research and Innovation
Learning resources are often considered key intellectual property in a competitive higher education world. However, more and more institutions and individuals are sharing their digital learning resources over the ...
Match: OER history; OER policy

OpenCases: Case studies on openness in education
Souto-Otero, Manuel; dos Santos, Andreia Inamorato; Shields, Robin; Lažetić, Predrag; et al.
OpenCases is a study which is part of the OpenEdu Project. It is a qualitative study consisting of a review of literature on open education and nine in-depth case studies of higher education institutions, a consortium ...
Match: OER policy; open education

Free learning: Essays on open educational resources and copyright
Downes, Stephen
There is a story to be told about open source, open content, and open learning from the point of view of the person desiring access to these things, rather than from the point of view of the provider. This book is a ...
Match: OER policy; open education