The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
The status quo bias and the uptake of open access
Cantrell, Melissa and Collister, Lauren

PublishedJuly 2019
JournalFirst Monday
Volume 24, Issue 7
CountryUnited States, North America

ABSTRACT
In this paper we argue that the framing of open access through language adopted by a variety of stakeholders serves to inhibit the uptake of open access publishing through the mechanisms of complexity and cognitive load. Using both quantitative and qualitative methods, we analyze both the language and tiers of decisions that confront authors seeking information online about open access. We conclude that this information is for the most part prohibitively complex and introduces contradictory interpretations and executions of open access that act to motivate a phenomenon known as the status quo bias. The only reliable method of counteracting this status quo bias in order to bolster the uptake of open access is to re-frame the language that is commonly employed in association with open access and to minimize the tiers of decisions expected of authors, which create a barrier rather than a gateway to open access engagement.

Keywords cognitive load · complexity · open access · publishing · status quo bias

ISSN1396-0466
RefereedYes
RightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
DOI10.5210/fm.v24i7.10089
URLhttps://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/10089
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar


Viewed by 597 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


▶ POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

MOOC strategies of higher education institutions in Lithuania: Status report based on a mapping survey conducted in November 2016 – February 2017
Rutkauskiene, Danguole; Jansen, Darco; Ukvalbergiene, Kristina; Gudoniene, Daina; Bartkute, Reda
Introduction (partial) Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have been a driving power for higher education for more than a decade. During this time, massive open online courses became one of the alternative models to ...
Match: status

MOOC strategies of European institutions: Status report based on a mapping survey conducted in November 2016 – February 2017
Konings, Lizzie; Jansen, Darco
Executive Summary This report presents the results of a MOOC survey amongst Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) with a focus on Europe (97% of responses out of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA)). The majority ...
Match: status

Socioeconomic status and MOOC enrollment: Enriching demographic information with external datasets
Hansen, John; Reich, Justin
To minimize barriers to entry, massive open online course (MOOC) providers collect minimal demographic information about users. In isolation, this data is insufficient to address important questions about socioeconomic ...
Match: status

Publishing in discipline-specific open access journals: Opportunities and outreach for librarians
Tomaszewski, Robert; Poulin, Sonia; MacDonald, Karen I.; Kaspar, Wendi Arant; vanDuinkerken, Wyoma
Open access (OA) journals promote the opportunity for peer-reviewed journal articles to be freely accessible. In recent years, the number of OA journals has exploded in all disciplines. Previous studies have identified ...
Match: open access; publishing

cOAlition S: Making Open Access a reality by 2020: A declaration of commitment by public research funders
Schiltz, Marc; Moedas, Carlos; European Research Council; Science Europe
What is cOALition S? On 4 September 2018, 11 national research funding organisation, with the support of the European Commission including the European Research Council (ERC), announced the launch of cOAlition S, an ...
Match: open access; publishing

Diamond Dreams, Unequal Realities: The Promise and Pitfalls of No-APC Open Access
Sayab, Maryam
When Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation announced it was being wound down in 2025, the decision stunned many in the open science community. In an editorial letter published that April, the journal’s founding ...
Match: open access; publishing

The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles
Piwowar​​, Heather; Priem​​, Jason; Larivière, Vincent; Alperin, Juan Pablo; et al.
Despite growing interest in Open Access (OA) to scholarly literature, there is an unmet need for large-scale, up-to-date, and reproducible studies assessing the prevalence and characteristics of OA. We address this need ...
Match: open access; publishing

Open content
Haßler, Björn; Mays, Tony; Ang, Peng Hwa; Mansell, Robin
Match: open access; United States

Uptake of OER by staff in distance education in South Africa
de Hart, Kerry Lynn; Chetty, Yuraisha B.; Archer, Elizabeth
Open Educational Resources (OER) emerged within the context of open education which is typically characterized by the sharing of knowledge and resources and the exchange of ideas. Unisa as a mega open distance learning ...
Match: uptake

Comparing institutional MOOC strategies 2015 country report - Israel: Status report based on a mapping survey conducted in October - December 2015
Kalman, Yoram M.; Jansen, Darco; Goes-Daniels, Miriam; European Association for Distance Teaching Universities; HOME Project
Executive Summary This report details the responses of seven Israeli higher education institutions (HEIs) to survey questions about their MOOC offerings, and compares them to other European HEIs. The surveys show that ...
Match: status