The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
Journeys to open educational practice: UKOER/SCORE review final report
McGill, L. · Falconer, I. · Dempster, J A. · Littlejohn, A. · Beetham, H.

PublishedMay 2013
PeriodicalPages 1-12
PublisherJISC

ABSTRACT
In 2008 the JISC Good Intentions report concluded that the landscape around learning materials had changed sufficiently to support a range of sustainable models for sharing. The report charted and acknowledged the long history of approaches to support sharing that had helped to shape the landscape.

Most of the models highlight a growing acknowledgement of the need to build and support open and sustainable communities to share practice and resources. Indeed such communities are often the key to sustaining the service, whichever model is adopted. This is the type of model most likely to encourage sharing between teachers as well as learners.

The growing OER community is taking collaborative approaches to tackling the ongoing challenges of raising awareness, licensing and trust issues, and standards and technologies. The challenge for the UK now is to ensure that our HE institutions are enabled to create policies, practices and support their staff to accelerate the transformations required to contribute and benefit from this global movement. It is also vital to ensure that we capture the real picture of use and re-use of such services and collections to inform future OER programmes.

HEFCE funding for OER initiatives followed this report in 2009 and has, in many ways, provided some of the scaffolding and support for a variety of individuals, communities and institutions to move forwards in their own journeys, whether they started years before in other contexts or had just joined on the road to open sharing.

Keywords OER barriers · OER benefits · OER impacts · OER models · OER policy · open practice

RefereedDoes not apply
Rightsby-nc/3.0
URLhttps://oersynth.pbworks.com/w/page/60338879/HEFCE-OER-Review-Final-Report
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar


Viewed by 41 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

Open Practices: A briefing paper
Beetham, H.; Falconer, I.; McGill, L.; Littlejohn, A.
Contents What are 'open educational practices'? Why engage in open educational practices? OERs and open learning OERs and open pedagogies or teaching practices OERs and sharing learning/teaching ideas OERs and open ...
Match: McGill, L.; Falconer, I.; Littlejohn, A.; Beetham, H.; open practice

OER state policy in K-12 Education: Benefits, strategies, and recommendations for open access, open sharing
Bliss, TJ; Patrick, Susan
By sharing publicly funded learning materials as OER, we can move away from “recreating the wheel” in all 50 states and territories, enabling sharing and collaboration with learning materials, resources, and ...
Match: OER barriers; OER benefits; OER policy

Open educational practices: A literature review
Ross, Heather M.
A literature review on what is OER, what are the benefits, the barriers, the need for support and training, the stakeholders and their roles, and gaps in the literature at the time of writing.
Match: OER barriers; OER benefits

An investigation of faculty perspectives on barriers, incentives, and benefits of the OER movement in Turkey
Can, Gulfidan; Kursun, Engin; Cagiltay, Kursat; Conrad, Dianne; McGreal, Rory
The purpose of this survey study is to investigate faculty’s perceptions of the main incentives, barriers, and benefits to publishing their course materials for free within the open educational resources (OER) ...
Match: OER barriers; OER benefits

JISC/HE Academy OER Programme: Phase 3 synthesis and evaluation report
McGill, Lou; Falconer, Isobel; Littlejohn, Allison; Beetham, H.
The JISC/HE Academy OER Phase 3 programme (October 2011- October 2012) was designed to build on the sustainable practice identified in the first two stages (Pilot programme, and Phase 2 programme), and to expand in new ...
Match: Beetham, H.

The Common Core State Standards Initiative and its impact on OER
Bristow, Sara Frank
This case study, Deliverable 2 of SharedOER, examines the recent development of Open Educational Resources (OER) and syllabi within the context of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in the United States. It analyses ...
Match: OER barriers; OER policy

JISC/HE Academy OER Programme: Phase 2 synthesis and evaluation report
McGill, Lou; Falconer, Isobel; Beetham, H.; Littlejohn, Allison
Phase 2 of the JISC/HEA jointly funded UK OER programme was launched in October 2010. The aim of this second phase of funding was to build on the lessons learned in the pilot phase - across institutions, individual ...
Match: Beetham, H.

Exploring faculty use of open educational resources at British Columbia post-secondary institutions
Jhangiani, Rajiv S.; Pitt, R.; Hendricks, Christina; Key, Jessie; Clint Lalonde
How do faculty in British Columbia use Open Educational Resources (OER)? What are some of the ways in which they are using OER, and what are some of the barriers they face when using OER? A new research paper published ...
Match: OER barriers; OER policy

Opening public institutions: OER in North Dakota and the nation
Spilovoy, Tanya M.; Seaman, Jeff
North Dakota University System faculty are just beginning to understand the potential for open educational resources. The Open Educational Resources Initiative in North Dakota is the result of a 2013 Legislative ...
Match: OER barriers; OER policy

A qualitative investigation of faculty Open Educational Resource usage in the Washington Community and Technical College System: Models for support and implementation
Chae, Boyoung; Jenkins, Mark; Washington State Board for Community & Technical Colleges
This report is based on interviews with 60 faculty in Washington’s community and technical college system which was built upon a previous state-wide survey with 770 faculty. Faculty were queried about: * how and ...
Match: OER benefits; OER policy