The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
Building open learning as a community-based research activity
Thille, Candace

Published2008
PeriodicalChapter 11, Pages 165–179
PublisherOpening Up Education The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology Open Content and Open Knowledge, The MIT Press, The MIT Press
EditorsIiyoshi, Toru and Kumar, M. S. V.

ABSTRACT
Improvement in postsecondary education will require converting teaching from a solo sport to a community-based research activity. Herbert Simon (1998) The open educational resources (OER) movement has the potential to provide broader access to higher education and to markedly improve the quality of higher education for a diverse body of learners. Many OER projects to date have focused on making content that supports existing traditional forms of instruction openly and freely available. In these projects, the power of the Internet is used to overcome barriers to access by serving as a medium for freely distributing content. Making existing content available in this way is based on the revolutionary idea that education and discovery are best advanced when knowledge is shared openly. These OER projects have enabled a great leap forward in democratizing access to educational material. The next step in the revolutionary potential of the OER movement is in using technology to make instruction, as well as materials, accessible to the widest possible audience of learners and, at the same time, improve teaching and learning. The Challenge of Meeting the Growing Demand for Quality Higher Education Pressures of many kinds grow in both the developed and, especially, the developing world to provide more people with increased access to education (United Nations Educational, Scientifi c and Cultural Organization UNESCO-World Bank, 2000). At the same time, report after report announces that the quality of education, even in the developed world, is 166 Chapter 11 not keeping pace with the demands of what is now and what will be an increasingly knowledge-based economy (Desjardins, Rubenson, and Milana, 2006; The National Academy of Sciences, 2007; Presidents Information Technology Advisory Committee, 2005; Presidents Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, 2004). Traditional forms of developing and delivering instruction do not scale well to meet the growing demand. Individual faculty members working as solo practitioners who are experts in a domain of knowledge are often ill-equipped to address this changing context. A long-standing concern of many who have worked in higher education is that most faculty members knowledge of how students learn is not only insuffi cient but also largely intuitive (Smith and Thille, 2004). Most faculty members are dedicated instructors and spend much time and energy preparing for their course presentations. In traditional teaching this meant spending hours reading and rereading books and articles, writing and rewriting lecture notes, anticipating student questions and formulating answers. Historically, one of the fundamental errors in this process has been that faculty members often equate their own learning processes with their students learning processes. Unfortunately, research has shown that as teachers become more expert in any discipline, they are less capable of seeing and understanding the diffi culties encountered by the novice learner. This well-documented phenomenon of the experts blind spot tells us that instructional intuitions of experts can be faulty, because expertise in a domain can cloud judgment about what is diffi cult for novice learners in that domain (Nathan and Koedinger, 2000). In traditional small-scale, face-to-face instruction with a fairly homogeneous student population, the problem of the experts blind spot is suffi ciently mitigated by the dynamic feedback that the instructor receives from students through the instructors observations in class and through student questions.

Keywords evaluation of OERs · community of practice · OER research

Languageen
ISSN978-0-262-03371-8
URLhttps://oli.cmu.edu/wp-oli/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Thille_2008_Building_Open_Learning.pdf
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar



AVAILABLE FILES
Thille_2008_Building_Open_Learning.pdf · 462.4KB10 downloads



Viewed by 59 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

The Open Learning Initiative: Measuring the effectiveness of the OLI statistics course in accelerating student learning
Lovett, Marsha; Meyer, Oded; Thille, Candace
The Open Learning Initiative (OLI) is an open educational resources project at Carnegie Mellon University that began in 2002 with a grant from The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. OLI creates web-based courses that ...
Match: Thille, Candace

Driving student motivation in MOOCs through a conceptual activity-motivation framework
Khalil, Mohammad; Ebner, Martin
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) require students’ commitment and engagement to earn the completion, certified or passing status. This study presents a conceptual Learning Analytics Activity-Motivation framework ...
Match: activity

Collaborative environments to foster creativity, reuse and sharing of OER
Tosato, Paolo; Bodi, Gianluigi
The popularity of ICT within teachers has operated a shift between an individual way of producing resources to be used in class and a social way of doing it. Nowadays teachers do not have to be passive users, but ...
Match: community of practice

Obstacles to creating and finding Open Educational Resources: the case of research methods in the social sciences
Brent, Isabelle; Gibbs, Graham R.; Gruszczynska, Anna Katarzyna
Social Research Methods are approaches to undertaking research shared not only by the social sciences, but by many other disciplines. There is therefore enormous scope for the creation and re-use of open educational ...
Match: community of practice

Promoting use and contribution of open educational resources
Mishra, Sanjaya
Why do some teachers share their work, while others do not? What would enable teachers to share the knowledge resources developed by them to help foster knowledge societies? Sharing educational materials with an open ...
Match: OER research

Research agenda
Schuwer, Robert; Baas, Marjon; van Hees, Janina; Jacobi, Ria; et al.
To gain an overview of subjects that are currently on the research agenda, an analysis has been conducted on papers, presentations and abstracts presented at a variety of major conferences on open and online education. ...
Match: OER research

OERRH evaluation framework
Perryman, L -A.
The OERRH Evaluation Framework provides guidelines that allow project processes, outputs and outcomes to be evaluated in ways appropriate to the individual concerns of the various work packages, while at the same time ...
Match: OER research

OER use in the Global South: A baseline survey of higher education instructors
de Neto, José Dutra Oliveira; Pete, Judith; Cartmill, Tess; Cartmill, Daryono; et al.
The research presented here provides baseline data regarding the use of Open Educational Resources (OER) by higher education instructors in the Global South (South America, Sub-Saharan Africa, and South and Southeast ...
Match: OER research

Open educational resources: Global report 2017
Three documents have been developed in the framework of the 2nd World OER Congress. The two documents: Open Educational Resources: From Commitment to Action and the Open Educational Resources: Global Report 2017 provide ...
Match: OER research

Leading the Maricopa Millions OER Project
Raneri, April; Young, Lisa
With a reduced number of students purchasing required and necessary textbooks, higher education leaders must look to new opportunities to increase student success. While open educational resources have addressed this ...
Match: OER research