The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
Open access, megajournals, and MOOCs: On the political economy of academic unbundling
Wellen, R.

PublishedOctober 2013
JournalSAGE Open
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 1-16

ABSTRACT
The development of “open” academic content has been strongly embraced and promoted by many advocates, analysts, stakeholders, and reformers in the sector of higher education and academic publishing. The two most well-known developments are open access scholarly publishing and Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs), each of which are connected to disruptive innovations enabled by new technologies. Support for these new modes of exchanging knowledge is linked to the expectation that they will promote a number of public interest benefits, including widening the impact, productivity, and format of academic work; reforming higher education and scholarly publishing markets; and relieving some of the cost pressures in academia. This article examines the rapid emergence of policy initiatives in the United Kingdom and the United States to promote open content and to bring about a new relationship between the market and the academic commons. In doing so, I examine controversial forms of academic unbundling such as open access megajournals and MOOCs and place each in the context of the heightened emphasis on productivity and impact in new regulatory regimes in the area of higher education.

Keywords academic productivity · megajournals ·  · open access · scholarly publishing

RefereedYes
Rightsby/3.0/deed.en_GB
DOI10.1177/2158244013507271
URLhttp://sgo.sagepub.com/content/3/4/2158244013507271.article-info
Other informationSAGE Open
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar



AVAILABLE FILES
2158244013507271.full_.pdf · 364.8KB140 downloads



Viewed by 241 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

Mind the gap: 2013 Wiley survey reveals generational differences in authors’ open access views and experience
Warne, Verity
We have just announced the results of our 2013 author survey on open access, with over 8,000 respondents from across Wiley’s journal portfolio. The desire of authors to publish in high-quality, respected journals ...
Match: open access

Guidelines on Open Access to scientific publications and research data in Horizon 2020
The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation
The European Commission recently announced the guidelines on open access to scientific publications and research data. The purpose of these guidelines is to provide context and explanation for the rules on open access ...
Match: open access

Tri-agency open access policy on publications-Science.gc.ca
The objective of this policy is to improve access to the results of Agency-funded research, and to increase the dissemination and exchange of research results. All researchers, regardless of funding support, are ...
Match: open access

Publishing in discipline-specific open access journals: Opportunities and outreach for librarians
Tomaszewski, Robert; Poulin, Sonia; MacDonald, Karen I.; Kaspar, Wendi Arant; vanDuinkerken, Wyoma
Open access (OA) journals promote the opportunity for peer-reviewed journal articles to be freely accessible. In recent years, the number of OA journals has exploded in all disciplines. Previous studies have identified ...
Match: open access

The principle and the pragmatist: On conflict and coalescence for librarian engagement with open access initiatives
Potvin, Sarah; Kasper, Wendi Arant; vanDuinkerken, Wyoma
This article considers Open Access (OA) training and the supports and structures in place in academic libraries in the United States from the perspective of a new librarian. OA programming is contextualized by the ...
Match: open access

cOAlition S: Making Open Access a reality by 2020: A declaration of commitment by public research funders
Schiltz, Marc; Moedas, Carlos; European Research Council; Science Europe
What is cOALition S? On 4 September 2018, 11 national research funding organisation, with the support of the European Commission including the European Research Council (ERC), announced the launch of cOAlition S, an ...
Match: open access

A critical take on OER practices: Interrogating commercialization, colonialism, and content
Crissinger, Sarah
In Brief Both Open Educational Resources (OER) and Open Access (OA) are becoming more central to many librarians’ work and the core mission of librarianship, in part because of the perceived relationship between ...
Match: open access

The changing textbook industry
Band, Jonathan
Match: open access

Mandatory open access publishing for electronic theses and dissertations: Ethics and enthusiasm
Hawkins, Ann R.; Kimball, Miles A.; Ives, Maura; Kaspar, Wendi Arant; vanDuinkerken, Wyoma
This article argues against policies that require students to submit theses and dissertations to electronic institutional repositories. The article counters a variety of arguments often used to justify this practice. In ...
Match: open access

The adoption of Open Educational Resources by one community college math department
Wiley, David A.; Robinson, Jared; Clark, Phil; Gaudet, Donna; et al.
The high cost of textbooks is of concern not only to college students but also to society as a whole. Open textbooks promise the same educational benefits as traditional textbooks; however, their efficacy remains ...
Match: open access